Cops biased against Pell – lawyer
LAWYERS for Cardinal George Pell have hit out at Victoria Police, saying they presumed him guilty while investigating complaints against him.
Yesterday, the first day of a preliminary hearing, Robert Richter QC said police had failed to follow recommended procedures for the prosecution of prominent people. “There was a presumption of guilt,” he said. Mr Richter said his team had submitted 21 statements to police that were “exculpatory” (favourable to) of the cardinal, but they were not investigated properly.
The preliminary hearing is to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to commit the cardinal to trial on past sexual offence allegations.
Much of that hearing will be heard in closed court while complainants are cross-examined.
Earlier the cardinal made his way through lines of police as he arrived at court. Dozens of officers surrounded him as he walked a few metres from a car to the door of the court.
There is huge media interest in the case, with 27 outlets asking for a reserved seat in court. Journalists from all over the world are jostling for positions, including those from the
New York Times and CNN.
Some arrived as early as 4am.
A small group of protesters holding placards and sign set up outside Melbourne Magistrates Court.
The exact charges being faced by Cardinal Pell remain unknown, but involve multiple complainants. Last week, prosecutors confirmed they had dropped a charge following the death of one complainant.
After being charged last year, Cardinal Pell vehemently denied any wrongdoing and vowed to clear his name.
“I’m innocent of these charges. They are false,” he said.
Cardinal Pell is the most senior Catholic to ever be charged with sexual offences.
At the time he was charged he was working as the Vatican’s finance chief, and considered the third-most senior Catholic.