The Chronicle

REACTING TO OUR INTERNAL STORIES

SOMETIMES WE CAN BE WAY OFF MARK WHEN WE LET OUR INNER DIALOGUE TAKE OVER FROM THE FACTS

- MIND YOU WORDS: ROWENA HARDY

It’s no secret to those who know me well that I’m in my head a lot, if not most of the time and when I share that with others, I realise there are many like me.

The busyness of our external day to day life is often accompanie­d by constant cacophony of internal chatter, aptly summed up by Susan Scott in the phrase; “I’m always having a conversati­on with myself, sometimes it includes other people”.

You may resemble this, particular­ly if you’re someone who prefers to process informatio­n internally. But is that a problem? Not necessaril­y, but it can be.

Being in our head can lead to overthinki­ng, talking ourselves in or out of something, sometimes during the same internal conversati­on and just going round in circles.

Add in the potential for negative unconsciou­s bias, which can be hard to overcome, unless and until it’s exposed, and we can get ourselves into a bit of a pickle.

If the processing helps us to solve a problem, plan something or just get clear on our thinking, then it can be helpful.

However, if it’s just ruminating about something that has happened in the past or may happen in the future, then maybe not as that can lead us into rabbit hole, and we may get stuck there.

What potentiall­y trips us in these situations is assumption­s; I’ve written a bit about that before but feel it’s worth adding to as it’s easy for us to make assumption­s about situations and people and for others do the same to us.

Whichever way around it is, it’s not helpful because we’re making sketchy evidence mean something which is possibly untrue and, without any real evidence to the contrary, create an assumption or ‘truth’ which can seem plausible … to us anyway.

An example. We receive an email or message or engage in conversati­on which troubles or upsets us.

Instead of mentioning it or asking for more informatio­n from the source, we focus on what we think it means and make assumption­s based on previous experience, embellishe­d with emotional attachment to past hurts or grievances.

If we continue with our internal, negatively biased, representa­tion of the situation, we may well react ie continue to build a story around what has or hasn’t happened and decide to either disengage from the person or situation but say nothing or build up a head of steam and then engage from our position of hurt and emotional loading and fire off an email or message without any considerat­ion or filtering or handle any interactio­n poorly.

Whether we choose to engage or disengage, we’re still reacting and either way we’re choosing a solution, which is entirely ineffectiv­e.

If we choose to engage from reaction (with emotional load having hijacked any reasoning ability), we’re likely to trigger a reaction in the other person and then react to their reaction and so on.

As a result, we may risk losing a friendship or alienating someone which can cause more unnecessar­y hurt.

If instead we choose to respond, in other words stop, take a breath, and seek perspectiv­e by voicing our concerns without judgment or assumption when we first feel the impact, things are likely to go much more smoothly.

Seeking to understand and communicat­ing in a way that is nonemotion­al, honest and transparen­t vs jumping into assumption, will create a different result.

It is more likely that the other person will make clear what their intention was, responding to our questions rather than reacting to accusation­s, so the situation doesn’t escalate, misunderst­andings or assumption­s are quickly dissolved, and the relationsh­ip or friendship is preserved and perhaps made stronger due to the honest interactio­n.

It’s a challenge for any of us to rein in our reaction when triggered; and that reaction might equally be choosing to numb the hurt we’re feeling with our personal choice of chocolate, sugar, carbs, alcohol, drugs, excessive exercise, TV, Facebook or surfing the web – a temporary relief which offers no solution.

But it is possible when we take time to seek perspectiv­e, work on our emotional regulation and recognise that responding rather than reacting will always be the more effective choice for ourselves and others.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia