The Gold Coast Bulletin

FUR FLIES OVER LEVY

Veteran developer slams council over levy

- ALISTER THOMSON alister.thomson@news.com.au

BUSINESSMA­N Norm Rix says the Gold Coast council’s koala levy is furball rubbish.

In an extraordin­ary blast, Mr Rix says he is being slugged $1.91 million in environmen­tal charges for his 18.52ha developmen­t in Coomera, but had little confidence the money would go towards koala preservati­on.

Councillor Cameron Caldwell rejected the claims, saying the money was used to enhance the koalas’ environmen­t.

VETERAN businessma­n Norm Rix has launched an extraordin­ary attack on the Gold Coast City Council, saying its koala levy is “bullshit” and outof-town developers are treated better than locals.

Mr Rix, 83, says he is being slugged $1.913 million in environmen­tal charges for his 207lot, 18.52ha developmen­t on Amity Rd, Coomera, but had little confidence the money would go towards koala preservati­on.

He said he offered to spend the $1.913 million planting trees at a koala habitat on Yawalpah Rd but was denied.

“This is bullshit that has come out about the koalas,” Mr Rix said. “There are hardly any left. The council should have acted 30 years ago to do something about it. Now it is too late and they have put a ratepayers’ levy on it.”

The council this year decided to charge ratepayers a $3 koala tax to buy land to protect their habitat.

Developers pay money to the council as part of the Queensland Environmen­tal Offset Policy, depending on the environmen­tal value of the land.

Mr Rix, who claims he found just one koala – which he named Norma – while clearing land at his Amity Rd site, said “money should be spent directly in the area allocated for the koala”.

“We wanted to plant three trees per square metre for the amount of money we were paying to the council, but that was not acceptable to the council.

“That way we know the money is being spent on the koalas. As it stands, I doubt the money I spend will assist the koala.”

Instead, Mr Rix said the council was putting the money in a pool and using it for initiative­s such as the pedestrian and cycle bridge linking the Gold Coast Cultural Precinct to Chevron Island.

“When I read that in the paper, and how they are selling Bruce Bishop car park … that makes me bitter, very bitter.”

Planning committee chairman Cameron Caldwell rejected Mr Rix’s claim that the money would not go towards enhancing the koalas’ environmen­t.

He said the funds would go towards revegetati­on and other purposes.

“The council protects areas of high environmen­tal value from developmen­t and requires dedication of such land to the city,” he said.

“Where environmen­tal values are damaged through developmen­t, offset payments to the council are required to be paid by the developer. Offset funds are held in trust and constraine­d for revegetati­on and other related purposes.”

Mr Rix said the charges levied on developers, including $28,500 per lot for infrastruc­ture and $600 per lot for the National Broadband Network, are making it increasing­ly difficult to make developmen­t projects stack up financiall­y.

“I haven’t put a shovel in the ground and these are the charges from the council and state and federal government­s. And they wonder why land is getting so expensive.”

Mr Rix said he had been riled by the treatment of other developers, especially regarding the environmen­tal charges.

“I find it most unfair where some developers are treated differentl­y to others,” he said.

“With the Westfield-QIC developmen­t (Coomera Town Centre) it was government legislatio­n to allow all the koalas to be cleared with no charge to the developer.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia