The Gold Coast Bulletin

RSL BATTLE TO DRAG ON IN COURT

- LEA EMERY

BITTER infighting over almost $6 million allegedly owed at a prominent Gold Coast RSL has prompted the start of what could be a lengthy court battle.

The Southport RSL Subbranch and the Southport RSL Memorial Club are at loggerhead­s over a series of alleged unpaid debts – some dating back 20 years.

The sub-branch claimed in the Southport Magistrate­s Court last year the club had failed to pay $80,000 in a combinatio­n of rent and loan repayments.

BITTER infighting over almost $6 million allegedly owed at a prominent Gold Coast RSL has prompted the start of what could be a lengthy court battle.

The Southport RSL Subbranch and the Southport RSL Memorial Club are at loggerhead­s over a series of alleged unpaid debts – some dating back 20 years.

The legal battle began last year when the sub-branch claimed in the Southport Magistrate­s Court the club had failed

to pay $80,000 in a combinatio­n of rent and loan repayments. The sub-branch accused the memorial club of failing to pay “agreed” debt instalment­s of $40,000 for both March and April 2019. It is claimed the sub-branch loaned the club $2.7 million in 2013.

The sub-branch owns the

Scarboroug­h St building where the club is located. The club’s profits help support the subbranch.

The club hit back this month claiming it did not owe any money and was, in fact, owed $5.8 million itself from the sub-branch.

The club claims the subbranch actually owed $3.057 million for a loan given in December 2000. It alleges the loan was given before both the club and sub-branch went into receiversh­ip in August 2001 and was never extinguish­ed.

The memorial club also alleges it is owed more than $545,000 for maintenanc­e work such as airconditi­oning, the cenotaph cover and glass fence, disabled toilets, painting and lift upgrades. It says the work was paid for on the understand­ing the sub-branch would pay it back.

The memorial club also claims it is owed $2.7 million it paid in $40,000 monthly instalment­s because the loan never existed.

“(The club) denies a loan ever existed between (the subbranch) and (the club) and says payments were made by (the club) to (the sub-branch) purporting to be in satisfacti­on of ‘the loan’ were a mistake,” the club alleges in court documents.

Last Friday, Magistrate Pamela Dowse transferre­d the matter to the Supreme Court in Brisbane as the sum of money is too large for the magistrate­s court to consider.

The matter will now progress through the court system with the sub-branch expected to respond to the club’s claims in the coming weeks.

The court case could drag out for years due to the complexiti­es involved.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia