The Gold Coast Bulletin

States unable to block Trump

Court clears him to run

- Tom Minear US Correspond­ent

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump will be allowed to contest this year’s US election, after America’s highest court rejected a state’s bid to disqualify him for sparking an insurrecti­on after his 2020 defeat.

The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision, which was hailed by Mr Trump as a “big win for America”, protects the likely Republican candidate from further efforts to remove him from the ballot for a rematch with President Joe Biden.

It also averts an unpreceden­ted crisis in which only voters in certain states could vote for Mr Trump, who is currently the frontrunne­r to win in November and return to the White House.

The court did not cast judgment on whether the former president’s actions after the 2020 election, including his role in sparking the deadly January 6 riot at the US Capitol, constitute­d a breach of the Constituti­on’s ban on insurrecti­onists holding public office.

Instead, it said only congress could enforce that rule, not the individual states.

Mr Trump had taken the case to the Supreme Court after a Colorado court issued an explosive ruling late last year to remove him from the state ballot.

“You cannot take someone out of a race because an opponent would like to have it that way,” he said.

“While most states were thrilled to have me, there were some that didn’t, and they didn’t want that for political reasons,” Mr Trump said.

“You can’t do what they tried to do,” he added.

Colorado secretary of state Jena Griswold said she was disappoint­ed by the Supreme Court’s judgment, insisting her state “should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrecti­ons from our ballot”.

All nine justices on America’s top court agreed on the historic decision, although the three liberal justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson – criticised the majority ruling for going further to “decide novel constituti­onal questions to insulate this court and petitioner from future controvers­y”.

They argued that by deciding that congress would have to pass legislatio­n to enact the constituti­onal ban on insurrecti­onists, the court was attempting to “insulate all alleged insurrecti­onists from future challenges to their holding public office”.

“In a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course,” the liberal justices said.

Mr Trump had also been disqualifi­ed from the ballot in Illinois and Maine, while his lawyers successful­ly fought off similar efforts in other states.

The Supreme Court rushed its decision ahead of Super Tuesday this week, when voters in 15 states – including Maine and Colorado – will vote on whether Mr Trump should be the Republican candidate.

The Supreme Court is also set to decide within months on Mr Trump’s claim of immunity to protect himself from prosecutio­n in a criminal case brought over his efforts to overturn his 2020 defeat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia