The Guardian Australia

What’s the best cheap compact camera with image stabilisat­ion?

- Jack Schofield

There are many different types of camera, and even digital compacts come in several different varieties. As it happens, there are two that would suit you: “enthusiast compacts” and “travel zooms”. Unfortunat­ely, you would like something that fits both categories, and as far as I know, there’s only one of those.

“Enthusiast compacts” are small cameras designed for people who normally use a DSLR with multiple lenses but want a second camera they can slip in a pocket when not carrying their main kit around. They have to deliver high image quality, and price isn’t that important. If you can afford a good DSLR with extra lenses, you can probably afford a compact camera that delivers similar results.

The Canon G1 helped kick-start this market, but the Sony RX100 has become many enthusiast­s’ compact of choice. I’m not surprised to hear your YouTube photograph­er recommende­d it, and it has made several appearance­s in Ask Jack.

Although the latest £1,000 RX100 M5 may be out of your price range, there are four earlier versions, and you may be able to find one at an affordable price. For example, you can still get an original 2012 model for £335.70.

However, enthusiast compacts do not offer the optical zoom range you’re after. Typically they have 3x zoom lenses, and the M5 only covers 24mm to 70mm.

Travel zooms

The “travel zoom” design trades image quality for zooming ability. It uses a smaller, cheaper image sensor, which enables manufactur­ers to include a much better zoom range in a smaller lens. Travel zooms start with 10x zoom lenses, but many now do more. For example, the Sony Cybershot HX80 and HX90 have 30x zooms, the Nikon Coolpix A900 has a 35x zoom, while the Canon PowerShot SX720 HS has a 40x zoom. In film-camera terms, the Coolpix A900’s zoom goes from 24mm to 840mm, which is amazing. (The Nikon P900 has an 83x optical zoom covering 24mm to 2000mm, but it’s more like a DSLR.)

The bad news is that the longer the zoom, the harder it is to keep the camera still.

The good news is that travel zooms are in your price range, and typically cost around £250 to £350.

The one I’d recommend for your purposes is the Sony Cybershot HX90, which has some things in common with the RX100 range but at a much lower price. It has a 30x zoom and a pop-up electronic viewfinder for £314.98.

Where you make sacrifices are the sensor and the maximum lens aperture. Like most travel zooms (and your current Canon), the HX90 has 1/2.3in sensor, which is only a quarter of the size of the RX100’s one-inch sensor. Also, it has an f/3.5– f/6.4 lens where the RX100 M5 has a much faster f/1.8–f/2.8 lens. The HX90 will not be as good for low light and night work, but it should still be pretty good.

However, as mentioned above, there is a camera that combines a long zoom with a large sensor to give you the best of both worlds: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS-100EBK, aka the TZ-100. Like the Sony RX100, it has a one-inch sensor, but unlike other enthusiast compacts, it has a 10x zoom range covering 25mm– 250mm.

At around £523, the Lumix DMCZS100EB­K is twice the price of some travel zoom cameras, but it’s within your budget, and should meet your needs. The larger sensor should give you better results at night. Also, at 300g, it’s still portable, though it’s not as light as the leading enthusiast compacts, the Lumix DMC-LX10 / LX-15 (260g) and the Sony RX100 M5 (220g).

The Sony HX90 and HX90V (with GPS) are great compacts for the average traveller. But given your interest in both night shots and experiment­ing with photograph­y, the Lumix TZ-100 might be worth the extra cost.

Who needs a stabiliser?

Image stabilisat­ion helps to counteract the slight camera movements that are inevitable when taking handheld photograph­s. They don’t help with large camera movements or moving subjects, and are actually more useful when fitted to video cameras and binoculars. They are also useful with telephoto lenses, because magnifying the subject also magnifies the effect of camera shake.

There are two traditiona­l solutions to the camera-shake problem. The first is to use a faster shutter speed. The “rule of thumb” is “one over the focal length”. With a 50mm (or equivalent) lens, use a shutter speed of at least 1/50th of a second. With a 400mm lens, use 1/400th.

When there isn’t enough light for a fast shutter speed, use a tripod, or find another way to stabilise the camera. This is by far the best solution for landscapes, especially at night. There may be some slight subject movement, but that often adds to the picture rather than detracting from it. (Long exposures of moving water have become a cliché.)

If you can’t use a tripod or monopod, there are temporary substitute­s. Brace yourself against a fence or lamp post, or stand the camera on a wall. This is somewhat easier now you can use your smartphone as a remote for your real camera.

Another idea is to take a sequence of five or 10 stills: many digital cameras can do this if you hold down the shutter release. After that, just pick the sharpest shot and delete the rest.

The least good idea is to increase the camera’s ISO rating. This makes it think you’re using a faster (more light-sensitive) film, so it sets a faster shutter speed. However, increasing the ISO too much reduces the image quality. It also increases “noise”, which can create a grainy effect.

Increasing the ISO rating does provides faster shutter speeds, which does reduce the chance of camera shake, but it’s not the same as image stabilisat­ion.

Image stabiliser­s

Most of the better compact cameras and DSLRs now have image stabiliser­s, which come in two main varieties. Optical stabiliser­s move an element inside the lens to compensate for slight movements. Sensorshif­t stabiliser­s move the sensor slightly.

The Sony compact cameras and the Lumix TZ-100 have optical stabiliser­s. The Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Lumix DMC-LX10 have sensor-shift stabiliser­s.

In-lens optical stabiliser­s are arguably best for big interchang­eable lenses on DSLRs: both Nikon and Canon have gone that way. The drawback is that it bumps up lens prices. Unfortunat­ely, I can’t say if sensor-shift stabiliser­s work better on small cameras with small lenses, and I haven’t been able to find any comparison tests on compacts. If you’re interested, read some reviews of the Lumix DMC-LX10 / LX-15. It’s Wirecutter’s pick for The Best Point-and-Shoot Camera, ahead of the Sony RX100.

I’ve set up the main cameras mentioned at DP Review so that you can compare specificat­ions side by side with your PowerShot 110. You can also add or remove alternativ­es, of which there are many. If you are buying in the UK, check prices at Camera Price Buster.

Have you got a question? Email it to Ask.Jack@theguardia­n.com

 ?? Photograph: Maxime Bessieres / Alamy/Alamy ?? ‘I’m struggling to find the perfect camera for my needs ... Can you suggest anything around €250?’
Photograph: Maxime Bessieres / Alamy/Alamy ‘I’m struggling to find the perfect camera for my needs ... Can you suggest anything around €250?’
 ?? Photograph: Panasonic ?? Best of both worlds … the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS-100EBK, AKA the TZ-100.
Photograph: Panasonic Best of both worlds … the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS-100EBK, AKA the TZ-100.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia