The Guardian Australia

$444m reef grant to cost taxpayers extra $11m, Labor says

- Lisa Cox

The transfer of $443.8m to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation will cost taxpayers another $11m in public debt interest, Labor’s treasury spokesman Chris Bowen says.

Bowen has questioned what oversight Treasury and the Department of Finance had of the decision to award such a large amount of funding to the small charity in one instalment.

Bowen said it “defies logic” that treasury or the department of finance would have supported the grant to the not-for-profit foundation without a competitiv­e tender process.

The full $443.8m was transferre­d to the foundation on 28 June and is being held across a number of term deposit accounts.

“Instead of contributi­ng to paying down debt, the $440m is accruing interest for the foundation, and under the terms of the Turnbull government, the first $21m of interest can be used for administra­tion costs,” Bowen said.

“It’s hard to believe that the treasurer or finance minister were absent at the meeting that saw $440m handed over without any sort of competitiv­e or tender process beforehand.”

On Wednesday, the committee for a Senate inquiry into the grant resolved to hold two more days of hearings in Canberra next month, one with the foundation’s chair John Schubert and other board members, and another that will call on department officials, including from treasury and finance, to appear.

Bowen said there were several questions that should be answered, such as when the treasurer Scott Morrison and the finance minister Mathias Cormann first learned of the proposal, when the department­s were first made aware of it and whether they were asked to scrutinise the policy.

“The Treasury and Finance need to attend and fully participat­e in the Senate inquiry,” he said.

The comments come after the government spent another day under pressure in question time about whose idea it was to award the foundation the money and what due diligence was done.

“Mr Speaker, as I have told the house previously, there was due diligence conducted by my department,” environmen­t and energy minister Josh Frydenberg said.

“In the first phase of due diligence, they looked at its governance, its structure, its constituti­on, its project management, its fundraisin­g, its capacity for growth, its board compositio­n and its scientific expertise, Mr Speaker.”

He said a second phase of due diligence before he signed off on the grant “made it very clear that they looked at the corporate informatio­n, compliance with applicable laws, litigation, asset checks, asset checks with the directors”.

The Labor leader, Bill Shorten, asked the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, “if it was such a good idea, why won’t the prime minister tell us whose idea it was?”

“The leader of the opposition has clearly not been listening to the minister who has said a number of times, as have others, that the decision to make a contributi­on to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation was made prior to the budget and went to the full prebudget Cabinet process,” Turnbull said.

 ?? Photograph: Nelli Huié/Climate Council ?? Chris Bowen says it is ‘hard to believe’ the treasurer or finance minister was not at the meeting where the Great Barrier Reef Foundation was awarded $444m.
Photograph: Nelli Huié/Climate Council Chris Bowen says it is ‘hard to believe’ the treasurer or finance minister was not at the meeting where the Great Barrier Reef Foundation was awarded $444m.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia