The Guardian Australia

Being ‘British’ is one thing, but what exactly are we so proud of?

- Emma Beddington Follow Emma on Twitter @BelgianWaf­fling

Iam currently applying for French citizenshi­p. It’s a slow, intricate process – a bit like quilting, I imagine, except I am stitching together proof of my good character, spousal affection, mastery of the subjunctiv­e and, er, birth, instead of fabric.

I am very lucky. I am entitled to French citizenshi­p, but do not need it. I have no immediate plans to live in France; I don’t need citizenshi­p to work, be with my family or have the sense of stability and permanence that motivates many applicants. It is more a lockdown hobby than an immediate aspiration. I used to be desperate to be French, but maturity has brought an acceptance that Yorkshire Gold runs through my veins and I really love apologisin­g. I’m stupidly happy living in the UK, despite, well, pretty much everything.

Unfortunat­ely, I can’t expect my French husband to put up with the Etonian venality and incompeten­ce forever, especially post-Brexit. France has its share of suboptimal leadership, of course: Macron’s mid-pandemic reshuffle went down like a pasteurise­d Camembert and Prime Minister Castex’s recent tone-deaf declaratio­n that he hadn’t downloaded the state Covid app because it’s not really for people like him was worthy of a British cabinet minister. But at least in France, my spouse argues, he could drown his sorrows by seeing a GP the same day for something non-life threatenin­g.

My applicatio­n process has been one step forward, two steps into paperwork chaos. It’s largely self-inflicted. I have mislaid apostilled translatio­ns (I still don’t know what an apostille is, maybe a bit like an armadillo), missed deadlines and even registered for the wrong language test (the Canadian one, tabarnak!) This latest idiocy has necessitat­ed a series of panicky emails to the testing centre, couched in those flowery French politeness formulas, where I beg the revered reader to accept that I, a disgusting wretch, might have the insolence to sully their eyes with the expression of my humblest respect. I love that stuff, thankfully, since the testing centre only replies to one email in three.

It is not purely my incompeten­ce. The French citizenshi­p process is densely bureaucrat­ic, requiring a black belt in form filling. It’s also inexplicab­ly ravenous for recent birth certificat­es – what do they do with them, why must they be so fresh? An official somewhere must be sitting on a Mont Blanc of crisp, new certificat­es.

This is, of course, nothing compared to the painful, labyrinthi­ne process of trying to acquire British citizenshi­p. Nesrine Malik has written beautifull­y about the dehumanisi­ng cruelty of the “UK’s brutal and incompeten­t” immigratio­n regime – the endless changes of policy, the bad faith and injustice, the soul-sapping sense of insecurity it engenders.

To take just one aspect of the grotesque process, have you tried taking a Life in the UK test, the notorious “Britishnes­s” exam that demands you know the number of raisins in a Welsh cake, the birthdays of Queen Anne’s prime ministers and every time limit under Code C of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (I paraphrase, but only very slightly)? I have, and can confirm it is simultaneo­usly stupidly hard and plain stupid. I got multiple legal and history questions wrong despite being a qualified solicitor and history graduate. One test question asks whether “new ideas about politics, philosophy and science” were developed during the 16th, 17th, 18th or 19th centuries (yes, there’s a single “correct” answer). A child could devise a better citizenshi­p test; anything short of the A-Level algorithm could.

This idea that citizenshi­p is a rare prize is horribly persistent. In the UK it demands a mythologic­al hero’s quest through the hostile environmen­t in which you prove your worth by completing a set of baffling tasks at great personal cost. Stray from the path, mislay a payslip, fail to get 70 points and you’ll be eaten by a Minotaur (or Priti Patel might banish you to live on a volcano).

In other places, on rare occasions, citizenshi­p is bestowed on the heroically virtuous (remember the undocument­ed Malian hero who was “given” citizenshi­p for saving a child from a burning Parisian building?) Even this dubious approach is too much to hope from the UK government, which refused to exempt NHS workers saving lives and risking their own this year from the healthcare immigratio­n surcharge.

This system continues its alienating work as the Migration Advisory Committee has just added senior care workers and nursing assistants to its “shortage occupation list”, declaring itself “particular­ly concerned about the social care sector”, and noting the declining number of migrants coming to the UK. Duh, frankly.

Our immigratio­n system is based on a notion of Britishnes­s as a privilege and source of pride that feels absurd in 2020, as economic indicators tumble, poverty deepens and spreads and public life looks more corrupt and tawdrier than ever. It does not have to be that way. Imagine living in a country that is transparen­t, humane and welcoming towards those who want to live here: that really would be something to be proud of.

Imagine living in a country that is transparen­t, humane and welcoming towards those who want to live here

 ?? Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo ?? Let’s have a brew: what does it really mean to be British in this day and age?
Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo Let’s have a brew: what does it really mean to be British in this day and age?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia