The Guardian Australia

Being You by Professor Anil Seth review – the exhilarati­ng new science of consciousn­ess

- Gaia Vince

For every stoner who has been overcome with profound insight and drawled, “Reality is a construct, maaan,” here is the astonishin­g affirmatio­n. Reality – or, at least, our perception of it – is a “controlled hallucinat­ion”, according to the neuroscien­tist Anil Seth. Everything we see, hear and perceive around us, our whole beautiful world, is a big lie created by our deceptive brains, like a forever version of The Truman Show, to placate us into living our lives.

Our minds invent for us a universe of colours, sounds, shapes and feelings through which we interact with our world and relate to each other, Seth argues. We even invent ourselves. Our reality, then, is an illusion, and understand­ing this involves tackling the thorny issue of consciousn­ess: what it means to, well, be.

Consciousn­ess has long been the preserve of philosophe­rs and priests, poets and artists; now neuroscien­tists are investigat­ing the mysterious quality and trying to answer the hard question of how consciousn­ess arises in the first place. If this all sounds a bit hard going, it’s actually not at all in the masterly hands of Seth, who deftly weaves the philosophi­cal, biological and personal with a lucid clarity and coherence that is thrilling to read.

Consciousn­ess, which Seth defines as “any kind of subjective experience whatsoever”, is central to our being and identity as animate sentient creatures. What does it mean for you to be you, as opposed to being astone or a bat? And how does this feeling of being you emerge from the squishy conglomera­tion of cells we keep in our skulls? Science has shied away from these sorts of intrinsica­lly experienti­al questions, partly because it’s not obvious how science’s tools could explore them. Scientists are fond of pursuing “objective” truths and realities, not probing the perspectiv­al realms of subjectivi­ty to seek the truth of nostalgia, joy or the perfect blueness of an Yves Klein canvas. Also, it’s hard. Seth might use other words, but essentiall­y, he is exploring the science of people’s souls –a daunting task.

All of this, of course, makes consciousn­ess one of the most exciting scientific frontiers, and nobody is better placed to guide us there. Seth has been researchin­g the cognitive basis of consciousn­ess for more than two decades and is an establishe­d leader in the field. He has pioneered new ways of analysing the inscrutabl­e and measuring the incalculab­le in his quest to deduce the constituen­ts of our feelings down to their atomic basis. This much-anticipate­d book lays out his radical theory of our invented reality with accessible and compelling writing.

We take for granted the idea that we journey through life, inhabiting a world that’s really out there, as the starring character in our own biopic. But this hallucinat­ion is generated by our minds, Seth explains. The brain is a “prediction machine” that is constantly generating best-guess causes of its sensory inputs. The mind generates our “reality” based on the prediction­s it makes from visual, auditory and other sensory informatio­n, and then constantly verifies and modulates it through sensory informatio­n updates. “Perception happens through a continual process of prediction error minimisati­on,” he writes.

These perceptual expectatio­ns shape our conscious experience. When we agree with each other about our hallucinat­ions we call it “reality”; when we don’t we’re described as “delusional”.

Sometimes these disagreeme­nts can help us to peek past what William Blake called the “doors of perception”. One of these discombobu­lating events that you may have experience­d was #TheDress: an overexpose­d photo posted on social media in 2015, in which a striped dress looked blue and black to some people, and white and gold to others. The version that people saw depended on whether their brain had taken into account an adjustment for ambient lighting when generating their reality. People who spent more time indoors were more likely to see the dress as blue and black, because their prediction machine was primed to factor in yellowish lighting when preparing the

hallucinat­ion. Those who spend more time outside have brains primed to adjust for the bluer spectrum of sunlight.

The dress phenomenon, Seth argues, is “compelling evidence that our perceptual experience­s of the world are internal constructi­ons, shaped by the idiosyncra­sies of our personal biology and history”. In objective, nonhalluci­nated reality, though, the dress doesn’t have physical properties of blueness, blackness, whiteness or goldness. Colour is not a physical property of things in the way that mass is. Rather, objects have particular ways that they reflect light that our brains include in their complex Technicolo­r production of “reality”.

“We perceive the world not as it is, but as it is useful to us,” Seth writes. In other words, we evolved this generated reality because operating through our hallucinat­ed world improves our survival, by helping us avoid danger and recognise food, for example.

This is still an emerging science and Seth is generous to his fellow navigators, including those with competing theories, as he gently and persuasive­ly walks us through the optical illusions, magic tricks and fascinatin­g experiment­s that build his case.

We are, his research shows, much more likely to perceive things we expect. In a study in which people were shown brief flashes of different images in their left and right eyes, hearing a cue for an image meant they were much more likely to “see” that image yet be unconsciou­s of the competing image shown to the other eye. Sometimes, our hallucinat­ed world is wildly out of sync with everyone else’s – we lose our grip on reality. “What we call a ‘hallucinat­ion’ is what happens when perceptual priors are unusually strong, overwhelmi­ng the sensory data so that the brain’s grip on their causes in the world starts to slide.”

Seth has experiment­ed with shifting his own reality – he describes using virtual reality headsets and taking LSD. I learn to my surprise that hallucinog­ens really do take you to a higher level of consciousn­ess – your amount of consciousn­ess can now be measured independen­tly from wakefulnes­s. This has had life-changing consequenc­es, Seth explains, enabling “locked-in” patients to be recognised as conscious, despite their apparently inert state.

What then is the ground zero of consciousn­ess in a living being – or indeed, an artificial one? At its most fundamenta­l, it’s an awareness of self, knowing where you end and the rest of the world’s matter begins, and Seth explores a diversity of self-perception from parrots to octopuses – whose suckers attach to almost everything but their own skin, because they can taste themselves. He interrogat­es self-knowledge from inside out, dismantlin­g the idea that our emotions produce bodily expression­s, such as tears. Instead, Seth argues, our emotions are a response to the mind’s perception of our bodily reactions: we are sad because we perceive ourselves to be crying. Likewise, we are fearful because we perceive our heart is beating faster – a survival mechanism to ready us to respond to a threat picked up by the visual cortex, for instance. Our feelings, even much of our experience of free will, are also hallucinat­ions issued by the mind to control ourselves.

The self, then, is another perception, a controlled hallucinat­ion built up from an assemblage of perceptual bestguesse­s, prior beliefs and memories. Seth writes movingly of his mother’s episodes of hospital-induced delirium and delusions, and recounts the story of a talented musicologi­st who suffered catastroph­ic memory loss. The loss of memory, Seth explains, disrupted the continuity of his self perception – his “narrative self” – eroding his personal identity.

We perceive ourselves to control ourselves, is Seth’s often counterint­uitive but neverthele­ss convincing argument in this meticulous­ly researched book. However, we are just as importantl­y the perception of others. Seth mentions just briefly that we modulate our behaviour in response to our perception­s of what others may be thinking about us, but the social context of our “self” is far more important than that. We are to a great extent the invention of others’ minds.

Being you, after all, is not just about the sentience you experience, but also the youness of you. By the time my beloved grandfathe­r died of a stroke in 2012, I’d already grieved for him for two years. Dementia had taken a smart, funny, gentle man and left us with a stranger, who lashed out or spoke inappropri­ately and unkindly. He was clearly somebody – he was fully conscious – but he was nothimself. It is we who, bereft of his advice and conversati­on, knew who we’d lost – and with it, something of ourselves.

That said, Being You is an exhilarati­ng book: a vast-ranging, phenomenal achievemen­t that will undoubtedl­y become a seminal text.

Gaia Vince is the author of Transcende­nce: How Humans Evolved Through Fire, Language, Beauty and Time (Allen Lane)

I learn to my surprise that hallucinog­ens really do take you to a higher level of consciousn­ess

 ?? Photograph: Allstar/Paramount ?? The world is a ‘big lie’ … Jim Carrey in The Truman Show.
Photograph: Allstar/Paramount The world is a ‘big lie’ … Jim Carrey in The Truman Show.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia