The Guardian Australia

It’s time to brace ourselves for a world without Roe v Wade. Here’s what we must do

- Kathryn Kolbert and Julie F Kay

Since Roe v Wade was decided nearly 50 years ago, abortion opponents have been plotting its demise. Now the end may be near. Feminists need our own plan to advance reproducti­ve freedom. That means preparing for a postRoe world. That’s not a future any of us want – but it is one for which we must be ready.

First, we must stop banging our heads against the supreme court’s marble walls. Republican­s have successful­ly stacked our federal courts with anti-abortion judges who believed that Roewas wrongly decided – and are willing to reverse it. By 2020 the supreme court had a solid 6–3 anti-Roe majority in place. This fall it will consider Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, a challenge to a Mississipp­i abortion ban that is an in-yourface test of Roe’sstaying power.

Whether or not Dobbs is the case that breaches the Roe levee, the federal courts are not our friends and the US supreme court is not our savior. On Wednesday, the supreme court failed to block a Texas law which bans abortion as early as six weeks and allows, and indeed incentiviz­es, any abortion opponent to sue any person who assists a woman seeking an abortion.

While abortion rights supporters should do everything we can to reverse these trends, we need to rally around a long-term, multi-pronged strategy, just as the anti-abortion movement implemente­d since Roe.

In the last two decades, a number of innovative advances for women’s equality and reproducti­ve justice have been made that must be replicated and expanded. The reproducti­ve justice movement, led by women of color, has successful­ly exposed the link between systemic racism and the denial of reproducti­ve freedom. They launched the effort that is gaining momentum to end the insidious Hyde Amendment, which has deprived Medicaid recipients of abortion funding since 1976, and have emphasized that true choice includes a full range of reproducti­ve options. Situating abortion rights within the fight for fair access to health care for all is the smart next step. The menu of reforms must provide unhindered contracept­ive access, including making the pill available over the counter; address the US’s appalling rates of infant and maternal mortality, which are experience­d by Black women in particular; provide gender-inclusive and gender-affirming healthcare for LGBTQ+ people; and provide fertility treatment for all, not just those who can afford it.

Medication abortion, a safe, effective way to end pregnancy, is stymied by politicall­y-motivated restrictio­ns which must be abolished. Midlevel medical providers are well able to prescribe medication abortion and, as we’ve seen during the pandemic, telemedici­ne can increase access to safe abortion in areas of the country that lack providers. Providing the medication by mail, through walk-in clinics, and in university health centers would allow patients to skip the hassle of traveling to clinics where there are often gauntlets of protestors.

But let’s be frank: when abortion is made illegal or inaccessib­le, it doesn’t go away – it goes undergroun­d. If Roe is overturned, many conservati­ve states will leap at the chance to make abortion illegal. Progressiv­e states will have to step up to assist women forced to travel for reproducti­ve health care. In the days before Roe, too many women risked their lives and fertility undergoing abortions by shady illegal providers. Some were fortunate to access safer abortion services offered by feminist networks such as the Jane Collective and the Clergy Consultati­on Service on Abortion. Today, with the advent of less risky medication abortion, activists and attorneys can support women who selfinduce abortions, which is not always a first choice but frequently a necessary one. We must prevent over-zealous prosecutor­s from bringing criminal charges against those who self-induce abortion or the people who assist them.

Now is the time to move beyond “saving Roe” and set in motion human rights-infused strategies that can unify abortion rights supporters and the broader women’s, LGBTQ+ and racial justice movements. When rightwing state legislator­s whip up their base at the expense of reproducti­ve freedoms, we need to cry out with loud and creative protests and demand that corporatio­ns and politician­s join the call for our rights. As the supreme court diminishes Roe, let’s call for a blitz of laws in Democratic-led states that assert abortion as a right for all who need it.

To counter the chill of this ultra-conservati­ve supreme court, we propose a long-term goal: a consti

tutional amendment providing for gender equity. This super-charged Equal Rights Amendment would guarantee full equality and protection for sexuality and reproducti­ve freedoms for all and without harmful government interferen­ce or denial of access to key services because of one’s income, race or geography. Let’s begin this bold action by building the political power necessary to make such an amendment a reality.

If and when the Trump-reconfigur­ed supreme court succeeds in taking apart Roe, we know this will not be the immediate end of abortion rights in the US; rather it is the beginning of a new stage of the fight. It is time nowfor a more audacious, collaborat­ive movement to safeguard and expand the reproducti­ve freedom that is a human right for all.

Kathryn Kolbert and Julie F Kay are the authors of Controllin­g Women: What We Must Do Now to Save Reproducti­ve Freedom. Kay is a human rights attorney who has argued for abortion rights internatio­nally including before the European Court of Human Rights in A, B and C v Ireland, which spurred liberaliza­tion of Ireland’s abortion law. Kolbert is a public-interest attorney who cofounded the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights and argued Planned Parenthood v Casey, the 1992 supreme court case, widely credited with saving Roe v Wade

 ??  ?? Anti-abortion protestors outside the US supreme court in June. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA
Anti-abortion protestors outside the US supreme court in June. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia