The Guardian Australia

The Observer view on the Texas abortion ban

- Observer editorial

Last Wednesday, a near-total ban on abortion was implemente­d in Texas. Women are now prevented from getting an abortion six weeks after conception (a point at which many women do not even realise they are pregnant), even in cases of rape or incest. It is the latest, and most extensive, erosion of women’s reproducti­ve rights that has long been championed by the US religious right. In the words of Justice Sonia Sotomayer – in a dissenting opinion to the supreme court’s decision to allow the law to be implemente­d while its constituti­onality is determined in the coming years – it is a “breathtaki­ng act of defiance of the constituti­on… and of the rights of women seeking abortion throughout Texas”.

The consequenc­es for women living in the second most populous state in the US will be devastatin­g. It is estimated the law will prevent 85% of Texan women who want an abortion from accessing one in the state; for the vast majority of these women who cannot afford the time and resources required to travel out of state, this means they will be unable to access safe abortion at all. In a shocking contravent­ion of their human rights, women with unwanted pregnancie­s will be forced to carry them to term and undergo the danger and trauma of childbirth.

A wealth of internatio­nal evidence shows the futility of banning abortion; rates are no lower in countries where it is illegal or severely restricted, but many more women die as a result of being forced to seek illegal and unsafe procedures. The only way to effectivel­y reduce abortion rates is by expanding women’s access to contracept­ion, yet conservati­ves in the US have consistent­ly sought to limit their access to free birth control.

The way that Texas legislator­s have sought to get around the unconstitu­tionality of their ban is chilling in the extreme. Rather than leaving enforcemen­t of the ban up to the state, the legislatio­n allows anybody in the world to sue those involved in providing abortion care or practical support to women seeking abortion for at least $10,000 plus legal costs.

The law is framed so broadly that anyone who could be construed to have aided a woman in getting an abortion – from a friend offering advice to a taxi driver picking them up for an appointmen­t – could fall foul of these provisions. This is an insidious and misogynist way of targeting women and the support networks they need to rely on if they find themselves needing an abortion.

The consequenc­es are likely to extend far beyond Texas: Republican­s in six more states are preparing to rush through bills based on the Texas law. And the anti-women’s rights majority that now exists on the supreme court puts a woman’s constituti­onal right to abortion, establishe­d back in 1973, at risk.

It is perhaps tempting to look at the dire situation facing women in Afghanista­n, where the Taliban’s takeover has put women in extreme mortal danger, and feel uncomplica­ted relief that in liberal democracie­s such as the United States women’s freedoms will never face the same extraordin­ary level of threat from male fundamenta­lists. Yet the Texas ban – and threats to women’s reproducti­ve freedoms from authoritar­ian leaders within the EU – highlight that taking the hard-fought gains of second-wave feminists for granted is risky in the extreme.

Civil rights struggles rarely stand still: history shows us that momentous achievemen­ts, such as the popular vote to legalise abortion in Ireland in 2018, are often punctuated with periods where recently won rights are eroded. Women across the world continue to be oppressed on the basis of their reproducti­ve biology: the patriarcha­l forces that seek to control women and their bodies are embedded everywhere. Preventing things from slipping backwards, let alone achieving progress, is a fight in and of itself.

Here in the United Kingdom, women enjoy a better range of legal protection­s than in the US, where there is no right to paid time off work after having a baby or universal access to free childcare or healthcare. But in Northern Ireland, women are still struggling to access abortion services despite abortion being legalised almost two years ago. A woman is killed by a man every three days, yet there remains a huge shortfall in domestic abuse services for women who experience male violence, while the women’s prison estate is filled with domestic abuse survivors. Rape conviction­s are at a historic low, effectivel­y decriminal­ising male violence against women.

Those women considered by men to be past their sexual prime face a particular­ly toxic blend of sexism and ageism in workplaces, in their

communitie­s and in our public discourse. The Texas abortion ban shows how vulnerable women’s rights can be even in the richest liberal democracie­s. In societies such as the US and the UK, women have immeasurab­ly more freedom than they did a century ago and still do in many parts of the world. Yet there is nowhere in the world where women are truly free from the burden of patriarcha­l oppression. We ignore that at our peril.

 ?? Photograph: Jay Janner/AP ?? Protesters campaign against the six-week abortion ban at the Capitol in Austin, Texas.
Photograph: Jay Janner/AP Protesters campaign against the six-week abortion ban at the Capitol in Austin, Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia