The Guardian Australia

First Nations in Ontario could receive billions in back-rent after court ruling

- Leyland Cecco in Toronto

Canada could face compensati­on payments to Indigenous communitie­s worth billions, after a court found it had willfully deprived First Nations of the immense wealth extracted from their lands.

The Crown has made payments to 23 First Nations of the Robinson-Huron Treaty territory since 1850, in exchange for a territory roughly the size of France.

In 1874, the payment was increased to C$4 a year. It has not changed since then.

On Friday, Ontario’s court of appeal ruled unanimousl­y that the meagre payments were a violation of the spirit of the treaty: to share the wealth generated from the territory.

The case has now been sent back to a trial judge to determine how much money the nearly 40,000 Anishinaab­e descended from nations that ceded the territory are owed – a figure will probably be in the billions of dollars. It is not yet clear if the federal government, the government of Ontario, or both, will be required to pay the compensati­on.

At a press conference on Tuesday, Chief Dean Sayers of the Batchewana First Nation hailed the court victory as “an incredible moment in the history of our lands here in Canada” and said the decision represente­d a long-overdue chance for Anishinabe­k people to “reclai[m] our inheritanc­es”.

The treaty, named after fur-trader-turned-politician William Benjamin Robinson, who negotiated with Indigenous communitie­s, covers 35,700 square miles of land and grants Indigenous communitie­s the rights to hunt and fish the land – as well as an annual “rent” paid to each person.

In the 171 years since the treaty was signed, the land on the north shores of Lake Huron and Lake Superior has

become a valuable source of revenue for the mining and forestry industries.

But despite the immense revenues generated by industry, remote First Nations communitie­s live in abysmal conditions, sometimes lacking access to clean drinking water.

“Obviously, the Anishinaab­e would not have expected their communitie­s to suffer a range of deprivatio­ns, including substandar­d housing and boil water advisories, while non-Indigenous communitie­s thrived,” the court said. “Nor was it likely, based on the Anishinaab­e principles discussed by the trial judge, that the Anishinaab­e would have wished to enjoy great personal wealth while their fellow Canadians suffered deprivatio­n.”

The high court victory marks the latest win for the litigants, who have “won every step of the process” in the multi-year fight, Mike Restoule, chair of the Robinson Huron Treaty Litigation Fund, told reporters.

Ontario’s attorney general’s office says it is reviewing the decision, but could not comment on a matter before the courts. The federal government has indicated it is willing to discuss a settlement if Ontario agrees to participat­e in the talks.

“We know it is the time now for the government of Ontario to embrace the reality, to embrace the facts, to embrace the history and also embrace the rule of law,” said the Wiikwemkoo­ng chief Duke Peltier.

Ontario has 60 days to appeal the ruling, which would send the case to Canada’s supreme court – but Indigenous leaders have instead called on the provincial government to join them at the bargaining table.

There is also mounting pressure on various levels of government to not appeal against court rulings that affirm Indigenous rights or significan­t final settlement­s due to those communitie­s.

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government has faced sharp criticism for its recent decision to appeal against a ruling that would pave the way for a huge compensati­on payment to Indigenous children who suffered in foster care.

 ?? Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters ?? Tipis are set up in Toronto, Ontario, this month. The province’s court of appeal has ruled that meagre payments violate the spirit of a 19th-century treaty.
Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters Tipis are set up in Toronto, Ontario, this month. The province’s court of appeal has ruled that meagre payments violate the spirit of a 19th-century treaty.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia