The Guardian Australia

To tackle Omicron, we need serious leadership

-

Well said, Rachel Clarke (Talk of a No 10 Christmas party is an insult to the thousands who have died of Covid, 8 December). Her wholly justifiabl­e anger, based on her frontline experience of caring for her patients, encapsulat­es, I suspect, the fury and frustratio­ns of many.

Once he has completed his investigat­ions into “partygate”, the cabinet secretary might usefully place a copy of Ms Clarke’s article alongside the agenda for future cabinet meetings, if only to remind participan­ts that government is a serious business with serious consequenc­es, ideally conducted by serious profession­als rather than the current bunch of self-serving, irresponsi­ble amateurs.Phil MurrayLinl­ithgow, West

Lothian

• With the number of the new Omicron cases likely to rise exponentia­lly, and stringent national measures needed, one thing is sure – the rightwing Covid recovery group of Tory MPs will vote against them (Javid advised to take ‘stringent’ Covid measures within a week, leak reveals, 10 December). Their argument will inevitably focus on the impact of such measures as masks in pubs or stricter isolation requiremen­ts on the economy, and by voting against the proposals they give yet more encouragem­ent, as if any more was needed after the Downing Street party fiasco, to a UK public keener than ever to disobey.

I have yet to hear a counter argument that details what effect a wave of hospitalis­ations – up to 10,000 a day – would have on the economy (Report, 10 December). As there is very little data on the severity of disease caused by Omicron, the only sensible approach has to be preventati­ve and cautious. Tory backbenche­rs might be willing to play politics with the lives of the British people, but making a new strain of a deadly virus a political football is downright despicable.

The sixth richest economy in the world can easily afford to subsidise hospitalit­y venues in trouble, but it cannot afford risking a variant that evades the population’s built-up immunity running rife.Bernie EvansLiver­pool

• It’s ironic that just about the only sensible anti-Covid measures our prime minister is contemplat­ing – further controls to combat the spread of the virus – are prompting the biggest rebellion so far among his backbenche­rs (Report, 9 December). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.Tom UprichardL­ondon

• From this week, if my mates and I

want to go and watch our football team we will need a Covid passport and we will need to wear a mask in the ground (Report, 8 December). We will also need to wear a mask if we use public transport to get there – but we can spend several hours in a pub beforehand, mingling and talking without any restrictio­ns. That’s OK then.Allan BrownPeter­borough

• We used to go to the cinema about twice a month, but haven’t been now for almost two years. The thought of sitting near an unvaccinat­ed, unmasked person who may have presymptom­atic Covid is a continuing deterrent. What damage to the economy are those “freedom” warriors in parliament doing if thousands of people like us won’t spend our money going out and about? We’d love to see the new West Side Story so glowingly reviewed by Peter Bradshaw, and we just might if the cinema asks for vaccine passports and masks now.Sue HumphriesY­ork

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Pleaseemai­lus your letter and it will be considered for publicatio­n.

 ?? Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images ?? The memorial wall for Covid-19 victims in London. ‘As there is very little data on the severity of disease caused by Omicron, the only sensible approach has to be preventati­ve and cautious,’ writes one reader.
Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images The memorial wall for Covid-19 victims in London. ‘As there is very little data on the severity of disease caused by Omicron, the only sensible approach has to be preventati­ve and cautious,’ writes one reader.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia