The Guardian Australia

Morrison warned foreign interferen­ce campaign on social media is a serious risk to Australia’s election

- Katharine Murphy Political editor

The Morrison government has been warned a coordinate­d interferen­ce campaign unleashed by foreign states or malicious actors through social media platforms is a serious risk to manage in the looming federal election campaign.

With the federal contest now imminent, a Senate select committee establishe­d in late 2019 to investigat­e the risks posed to Australia’s democracy by foreign interferen­ce through social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter and WeChat has used its first report to urge the Coalition to adopt better protocols before the poll.

The new report concludes Australia currently lacks some of the institutio­nal architectu­re needed to respond effectivel­y and proactivel­y to the threat of foreign interferen­ce.

The Select Committee on Foreign Interferen­ce through Social Media notes federal parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters has concluded that there was limited evidence of social media manipulati­on within Australia, including minimal use of bots, during the 2019 federal election.

But analysts from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute told the inquiry financiall­y motivated actors from Kosovo, Albania and the Republic of North Macedonia used nationalis­tic and Islamophob­ic content to target and manipulate Australian Facebook users during the 2019 election.

Australia’s home affairs department also warned in a separate submission that foreign interferen­ce activity against Australian interests was now occurring at an “unpreceden­ted scale”.

The new report also references a Queensland University of Technology study that concluded there were a substantia­l number of bots tweeting election related content in 2019, with a majority originatin­g from New York.

The Senate select committee, chaired by the Labor senator Jenny McAllister, warns the Morrison government it would be a “mistake” to wait for a serious attempt to subvert a legitimate democratic contest before taking corrective action.

The committee says it would be “naive” to believe Australia is immune from the sort of coordinate­d incursions seen in the United States during the 2016 presidenti­al election, and the general election in the United Kingdom in 2019.

Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning

“The policy challenges facing Australia over the coming years are of interest to more than just Australian­s,” the committee warns. “There are a range of foreign government­s, organisati­ons and individual­s who stand to win or lose from Australia’s political and policy decisions.

“Experience­s from overseas show us there are some foreign actors who also seek to introduce discord and social conflict as an aim unto itself,” the report says. “Technologi­cal developmen­ts mean that these actors have more options available than ever before to influence Australia’s processes.”

The report says while there does not appear to have been a large-scale coordinate­d interferen­ce campaign to date, that did not make a case for government inaction. “It is possible, if not likely, that Australia will face such an attempt in the future,” the report says.

The committee has recommende­d the Morrison government establish clear requiremen­ts and pathways for social media platforms to report suspected foreign interferen­ce, including disinforma­tion and coordinate­d inauthenti­c behaviour, and other offensive and harmful content.

The report notes that representa­tives from TikTok “did not know if they were required to report any coordinate­d foreign interferen­ce attempts that they detected on their platform – let alone who they could even report this to”.

It recommends the government “clearly delegate lead accountabi­lity for cyber-enabled foreign interferen­ce to a single entity in government”. The report notes it is “not clear who is responsibl­e for responding to a disinforma­tion campaign that targets the informatio­n environmen­t in an election period”.

The select committee says the government should establish “nonpolitic­al institutio­nal mechanisms for publicly communicat­ing cyber-enabled foreign interferen­ce in our elections” – including developing protocols for classified briefings to be given to the opposition during caretaker periods.

The report notes the decision “to reveal or conceal evidence of a foreign-backed disinforma­tion attempt is one that could have enormous implicatio­ns during an election campaign”. It says evidence given during the inquiry by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Home Affairs suggests there is no current obligation in the caretaker convention for the government of the day to brief the opposition if there is evidence of coordinate­d malicious action.

It also recommends a pre-election audit be undertaken through the Election Integrity Assurance Taskforce “to assess capability relevant to detecting disinforma­tion”.

The committee recommends the government should “take a proactive approach to protecting groups that are common targets of foreign interferen­ce but are not classified as government institutio­ns”. The report notes there are currently no clear protection­s

for groups that “influence Australia’s democracy but sit outside of government, such as diaspora groups, research institutio­ns and political parties”.

The deputy chair of the inquiry was the Liberal senator Jim Molan. In additional comments, Molan said he agreed “with parts of the majority report” but he intended to provide “more fulsome additional comments” after the Christmas break.

 ?? Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images ?? The Morrison government has been warned Australia currently lacks some of the institutio­nal architectu­re needed to respond effectivel­y to the threat of foreign interferen­ce in its democratic processes.
Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images The Morrison government has been warned Australia currently lacks some of the institutio­nal architectu­re needed to respond effectivel­y to the threat of foreign interferen­ce in its democratic processes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia