The Guardian Australia

High levels of toxic ‘forever chemicals’ found in anti-fogging sprays for glasses

- Gloria Oladipo

Anti-fogging sprays and cloths often used to prevent condensati­on on eyeglasses from wearing a mask or on face shields may contain high levels of potentiall­y toxic PFAS “forever chemicals”, according to a new study led by Duke University.

Researcher­s tested four of the toprated anti-fogging sprays as well as five top-rated anti-fogging cloths sold by Amazon. In all nine products, experts found fluorotelo­mer alcohols (FTOHs) and fluorotelo­mer ethoxylate­s (FTEOs), two types of per- and polyfluori­nated alkyl substances (PFAS).

PFAS have been dubbed as forever chemicals due to their longevity in the environmen­t.

“Our tests show the sprays contain up to 20.7 milligrams of PFAS per milliliter of solution, which is a pretty high concentrat­ion,” said study lead Nicholas Herkert, a postdoctor­al researcher at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environmen­t.

Exposure to some PFAs – perfluoroo­ctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoroo­ctanesulfo­nic acid (PFOS) in particular – have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, fertility complicati­ons and other health problems.

Herkert noted that FTOHs and FTEOs have not been studied extensivel­y, so scientists do not know what health risks they could pose, but research currently suggests that FTOHs inhaled or absorbed through the skin could break down in the body and become toxic, long-lasting PFAs.

The FTEOs used in all four anti-fogging sprays were also analyzed in the new study and exhibited substantia­l cell-altering toxicity and conversion to fat cells during lab tests, said Herkert.

“It’s disturbing to think that products people have been using on a daily basis to help keep themselves safe during the Covid pandemic may be exposing them to a different risk,” said Heather Stapleton, a distinguis­hed professor of environmen­tal chemistry and health at Duke.

Stapleton initiated the study after reviewing the ingredient­s in a bottle of anti-fogging spray she bought for her 9year-old daughter.

Stapleton noted that the other eight products did not have their ingredient­s listed, making it virtually impossible to tell if they contained toxic chemicals until they were analyzed using equipment from her research laboratory.

This study, conducted by Herkert and Stapleton with researcher­s from Duke University, Wayne State University, and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, is only the second ever to focus on FTEOS. The researcher­s published their peer-reviewed study on 5 January in the journal Environmen­tal Science & Technology.

Herkert and Stapleton said that more research would be needed to expand on initial findings, with larger studies involving tests on living organisms being the next step. Studies that include a larger sample size of sprays and cloths could also help identify other unknown chemicals being used in these products.

“Because of Covid, more people than ever, including many medical profession­als and other first-responders, are using these sprays and cloths to keep their glasses from fogging up when they wear masks or face shields,” said Stapleton. “They deserve to know what’s in the products they’re using.”

 ?? Photograph: Yves Herman/Reuters ?? Researcher­s have found that anti-fogging cloths and sprays contain ‘forever chemicals’ or PFAS.
Photograph: Yves Herman/Reuters Researcher­s have found that anti-fogging cloths and sprays contain ‘forever chemicals’ or PFAS.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia