The Guardian Australia

The Guardian view on water pollution: come clean on sewage

-

English water companies have got used to pumping raw sewage into the sea and rivers. An investigat­ion launched last year by the regulator, Ofwat, and the Environmen­t Agency, is a chance to put things right. But there are worrying signs that this opportunit­y to shine a light is in danger of being missed. The refusal by the Environmen­t Agency to reveal which 2,000 sewage treatment works in England are being looked at, and whether this will lead to delays in dealing with new complaints, raises questions about its commitment to openness.

That the investigat­ion is happening at all is due to huge efforts by campaigner­s. Concern over sewage dumps has been rising in response to water companies’ failure to tackle a longstandi­ng problem that increased extreme weather, due to climate change, is expected to make worse. Discharges of untreated waste into the sea or rivers are supposed to happen only in exceptiona­l circumstan­ces, to reduce flood risk. Over recent years, it has become clear that rules are being routinely flouted by an industry that puts profits before environmen­tal stewardshi­p. At the same time, the Environmen­t Agency’s record for punishing breaches has sharply declined following budget cuts. A report from a committee of MPs last week drew attention to the poor condition of rivers and called for a step change.

Last summer, Southern Water was fined a record £90m for pouring between 16bn and 21bn litres of raw sewage into protected coastal waters for financial gain. It was the worst environmen­tal crime in the Environmen­t Agency’s 25-year history. Yet the House of Commons last year stopped short of imposing a legal duty on water companies to stop releasing raw sewage, after ministers rejected a Lords amendment. The nine privatised water companies, which are regional monopolies, are instead obliged to make only “progressiv­e reductions” in the amount they pollute. Now the approach of the Environmen­t Agency to requests for informatio­n from the campaign group Fish Legal suggests an unwillingn­ess to hold the industry publicly to account.

Not every company has the same repulsive track record as Southern

Water. But the problem is systemic and cannot be blamed on one weak or unscrupulo­us board of directors. Over 11 years, £16.9bn has been awarded to water company shareholde­rs in dividends, while debt has rocketed to £48bn. Bosses are rewarded for failure: Liv Garfield, chief executive of Severn Trent, was awarded £1.9m in bonuses in 2020, a year when the company poured untreated waste into waterways on nearly 61,000 occasions.

It doesn’t have to be like this. Scottish Water is publicly owned, charges less, and since 2002 has invested nearly 35% more, per household, than privatised English water companies in the infrastruc­ture upgrades that are needed to limit pollution. Welsh Water is also non-profit. The English industry’s dismal track record makes renational­isation the obvious answer. In the short term, the bodies with responsibi­lity for regulating water must toughen up. A five-year plan from Ofwat, expected soon, must put much stronger emphasis on environmen­tal protection. And when the public seek informatio­n about which water companies are failing, they must be given it.

 ?? Photograph: Maureen McLean/Rex/Shuttersto­ck ?? Pollution in Berkshire’s Jubilee River.
Photograph: Maureen McLean/Rex/Shuttersto­ck Pollution in Berkshire’s Jubilee River.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia