The Guardian Australia

Behind this Nobel prize is a very human story: there’s a bit of Neandertha­l in all of us

- Rebecca Wragg Sykes

The Neandertha­ls have won a Nobel prize. Well, almost. Even if most people haven’t heard of Svante Pääbo, the Swedish geneticist whose work on ancient genomes and human evolution has landed him with 2022’s award for physiology or medicine, or the exact science behind palaeogeno­mics and ancient DNA, they certainly have heard of Neandertha­ls.

Honouring his contributi­on to building this incredibly vibrant field of palaeogeno­mics, the award is much deserved: you need vision, persistenc­e and pioneering methods to recover and sequence immensely old, fragile genetic material. But it’s also a recognitio­n of the astonishin­g revelation­s about our deep history that have come from palaeogeno­mics, which holds many untapped secrets about who we are today, including settling the long-debated question of whether Neandertha­ls and Homo sapiens ever encountere­d each other and, let’s say, “warmed up” those icy tundra nights (the answer is yes, many times).

For research communitie­s, the prize also feels like a recognitio­n of the relevance of work on palaeogeno­mics, human origin and archaeolog­y more broadly – and its continuing importance. Research in the 21st century on our hominin relations, including Neandertha­ls, is an entirely interdisci­plinary, collaborat­ive endeavour. All kinds of material analyses take place, in all sorts of ways. We use photogramm­etry or lasers to record entire caves in 3D; trace how stone tools were moved across the land; examine microlayer­s within ancient hearths; even pick out the starches preserved in grot between ancient teeth. And the advent of the ability to retrieve palaeogeno­mics from extraordin­arily old contexts was nothing short of revolution­ary. Today, DNA can be extracted not only from bones, but even from cave sediments: the dust of long vanished lives, waiting for millennia to be found. It has made it possible to assess individual Neandertha­ls’ genetic profiles, and has opened windows into previously invisible population histories and interactio­ns.

More than a decade on from the first big findings, today there is a huge community of palaeogeno­mics researcher­s, in large part thanks to Pääbo, with many having trained with him. Among the younger generation­s at the front end of the sampling, processing and analytical work – who may be the first to make and recognise key new discoverie­s – many are women. They include Mateja Hajdinjak of the Crick Institute whose work has identified complex patterns of interbreed­ing among Neandertha­ls and the earliest Homo sapiens in Europe, and Samantha Brown from the University of Tübingen, whose meticulous work on unidentifi­able bone scraps found the only known first-generation hybrid, a girl whose mother was Neandertha­l and father Denisovan (closely related hominins from eastern Eurasia). Alongside wielding scientific clout, they are overturnin­g outdated ideas that the “hard sciences” of statistics and white coats (or, in palaeogeno­mics, full-body protection) are male domains.

As an incredibly fast-moving field, palaeogeno­mics has achieved an enormous amount in a relatively short space of time. Innovative approaches are constantly being developed, and it must be admitted, even for those of us working in human origins, that keeping up with new methods and jargon can be challengin­g. The rapidity of advances, especially in competitiv­e academic contexts, has also led to a number of ethical issues. While many are being tackled, the direction of some research may soon force the field to lay out official standards and draw ethical red lines when, for example, reconstruc­ting the brains of Neandertha­ls using genetic engineerin­g.

Ultimately, while decoding ancient hominin genomes has allowed us to identify which inherited genes we have today – hence the physiology or medicine element of the Nobel prize – the recognitio­n of Pääbo’s work seems more about much deeper themes, resonating with something of a Neandertha­l zeitgeist. Since the discovery of their fossils more than 165 years ago, science has been engaged in dethroning Homo sapiens, demoting us from special creations to something still marvellous but not entirely unique.

Palaeogeno­mics bolstered this vision of an Earth that hosted many sorts of human, at least five of which were still walking around just 40,000 years ago; translate that figure to a generation­al scale, and you’d see a chain of just 2,000 people linking hands. Ancient DNA has confirmed that we are both embedded within a rich history of hominin diversity, and that we still embody that history ourselves. Alongside the genetic material we acquired “sideways” through interbreed­ing with Neandertha­ls and other species, a recent study found that less than 10% of our genome is distinctiv­e to Homo sapiens, evolved uniquely in us.

Most strikingly, popular understand­ing has shifted too. While some still drag out “Neandertha­l” as a slur, it now seems somewhat abstracted from general public views. The archaeolog­ical evidence for Neandertha­ls’ complex, sophistica­ted minds, with genetic revelation­s of how close we really are to them, has transforme­d opinion on who they were, and what that means for us. The knowledge that the very stuff of Neandertha­ls is still present today – in each human heart, thumping with fear or joy – has forged a new emotional connection not just to them, but to all our other hominin relations. It also underlines the fact that they, and we,

have always been part of a planetary web of life.

The most profound legacy of Pääbo’s establishm­ent of palaeogeno­mics is, or should be, humility. Because it turns out that many of the earliest Homo sapiens population­s entering Eurasia eventually shared the same fate as the Neandertha­ls they met and mingled with. Their lineages vanished, culturally but also geneticall­y, leaving behind no descendant­s among living humans. Perhaps the greatest inheritanc­e they left us is understand­ing that our story is not one of predestine­d, exceptiona­l success, but a blend of serendipit­y and coincidenc­e; and that being the last hominin standing is not necessaril­y something to be proud of.

 ?? Photograph: Hendrik Schmidt/AP ?? ‘You need vision, persistenc­e and pioneering methods to recover immensely old, fragile geneticmat­erial.’ Svante Pääbo with a replica of a Neandertha­l skeleton.
Photograph: Hendrik Schmidt/AP ‘You need vision, persistenc­e and pioneering methods to recover immensely old, fragile geneticmat­erial.’ Svante Pääbo with a replica of a Neandertha­l skeleton.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia