The Guardian Australia

Rishi Sunak’s politics are wretched. But as a British Indian, I see why his rise to the top matters

- Sonia Sodha • Sonia Sodha is an Observer columnist

As a Briton of Indian heritage, I had mixed feelings when I saw the images of the new prime minister, Rishi Sunak, celebratin­g Diwali at a Downing Street reception. Who could fail to be moved by the fact the UK has its first prime minister of colour? But there is also much I abhor about Sunak’s politics.

Because there’s more to me than my ethnicity, I don’t have any trouble holding both these thoughts in my head at once. Sixty years ago, racial discrimina­tion was perfectly legal: of course it matters that children can today see that you don’t have to be white to lead this country. But like his Tory predecesso­rs at the Treasury, Sunak is a fiscal hawk, making unnecessar­ily harsh spending decisions that have resulted in significan­t hardship. Like many Conservati­ves, he does not appear to place much stock in the idea of structural discrimina­tion, through which too many young people are held back from achieving their full potential because of their race or class background.

The generally positive reaction to Sunak entering No 10 also says something important about evolving British attitudes to race. Of course there are those who have expressed overtly racist views in reaction, such as the caller who told Sangita Myska of LBC “Rishi’s not even British”. But as Sunder Katwala, director of the thinktank British Future, has argued, these views that would have once been mainstream are now happily consigned to a tiny minority: just 3% of people agree with the statement that “to be truly British you need to be white”; 9% of white Britons say they would feel negatively about having an ethnic minority prime minister, a figure that would have undoubtedl­y been higher 20 years ago. It’s why the claim Sunak has faced a racist backlash made by the American satirical programme The Daily Show has landed so badly; it is more a reflection of the US left’s imperialis­t inability to understand the racial politics of other countries through anything other than an American lens.

None of this means that racism has been eradicated in Britain; there is plenty of evidence that in areas from employment to policing Britons of colour face barriers that white people do not. But attitudes have significan­tly shifted for the better. And the people most likely to overestima­te the extent of racist attitudes in society are those on the left, in a phenomenon Katwala has dubbed “progressiv­e pessimism”. This pessimism is dangerous; it contribute­s to an unhelpful and polarising narrative that many people don’t care about racism, rather than starting from the common ground that most of us think racism is bad and we should be trying to address it.

It is also important to note that, to the extent there has been racist reaction to the growing ethnic diversity of successive Conservati­ve cabinets, it has not been limited to the right. There is an ugly strain of leftwing thinking that posits that having Conservati­ve values is not really compatible with being brown or black. It is most evident in the Labour MP Rupa Huq’s comment last month that the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is only “superficia­lly black” (for which she has since apologised). This is not an isolated instance; in 2019, a Labour candidate said that Sajid Javid, then home secretary, “definitely orders lemon and herb Nando’s” in response to the jibe he “100% cooks boil-in-the-bag rice”; a modern version of the old “coconut” insult that he isn’t truly Asian. It isn’t just levelled at Conservati­ves: I get racist abuse online – and not just from low-follower accounts – for being a “race traitor” for deviating from views some consider to be acceptable, a form of racism no less hurtful than other kinds.

At the heart of this is the sense that people of colour ought to have a particular brand of leftwing politics and if they don’t we must wonder why. Earlier this month, the LBC presenter James O’Brien wrote of Suella Braverman: “Children of immigrants who despise other immigrants probably shouldn’t be in charge of immigratio­n policy. They often seem to be dealing with personal issues that shouldn’t be anywhere near the political space.” The implicatio­n is that Braverman’s appalling interventi­ons on immigratio­n derive from her status as a Briton of Indian descent. When challenged, O’Brien doubled down, claiming that what he said was OK because he didn’t mention race or ethnicity. I doubt he would take the same view of someone on the right making stereotypi­cal claims about “children of immigrants”; intended or not, it is a coded way of referring to non-white Britons.

The fact is that, although many ethnic minority groups lean towards Labour, there are significan­t numbers who support the Conservati­ves; for British Indians, this is as high as three in 10. One in three people with migrant parents think immigratio­n has had a negative cultural and economic impact on Britain. The idea these people need to justify their politics in a way white people don’t is just a variation on the rightwing theme that people with migrant heritage owe Britain a debt of gratitude that others do not. Brown and black people can have abhorrent politics. They can be racist too.

There is a lack of nuance on all sides of the debate about race. There is less racism in Britain than there was 40 years ago but it is far from eliminated. Race is not determinis­tic but, all other things being constant, some groups face greater barriers to success in many walks of life. Poorer health and employment outcomes for some groups of minority ethnic Britons cannot be attributed wholly to either their race or their class. Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, faced racism from the British press – and probably from within the royal institutio­n she joined – when she married Prince Harry, but there are credible allegation­s that she herself bullied her staff.

Ultimately, I am not sure it is any less bigoted to apply benevolent rather than malevolent stereotype­s to Asian and black people. It too undermines the goal of a society where the colour of someone’s skin isn’t worth commenting on because it genuinely no longer matters and in which we understand that our common humanity encompasse­s the bad as well as the good.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 250 words to be considered for publicatio­n, email it to us at observer.letters@observer.co.uk

There is an ugly strain of leftwing thinking that posits having Conservati­ve values is not compatible with being brown or black

 ?? Photograph: Henry Nicholls/Reuters ?? Rishi Sunak: a fiscal hawk, who makes ‘unnecessar­ily harsh spending decisions’.
Photograph: Henry Nicholls/Reuters Rishi Sunak: a fiscal hawk, who makes ‘unnecessar­ily harsh spending decisions’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia