The Guardian Australia

Labor accused of broken promise after delaying laws to address Australia’s extinction crisis

- Lisa Cox and Adam Morton

The Albanese government has further delayed a commitment to rewrite Australia’s failing national environmen­t laws.

The environmen­t minister, Tanya Plibersek, said the government would introduce legislatio­n in coming weeks to create two previously announced bodies – an environmen­t protection agency and a second organisati­on called Environmen­t Informatio­n Australia, which will provide public data on ecosystems, plants and animals.

But a commitment to introduce a suite of laws to address Australia’s extinction crisis, including new national environmen­tal standards against which developmen­t proposals would be assessed, has been pushed back to an unspecifie­d date.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletter­s for your daily news roundup

At a media conference on Tuesday, Plibersek said the announceme­nt of legislatio­n for a national EPA – to be known as Environmen­t Protection Australia – was a “historic day for the environmen­t”.

But she did not guarantee that the broader package of environmen­t laws, including the national standards, would be introduced before the next election. “They’ll be introduced when they’re ready,” she said.

The delay to wider reforms sparked accusation­s that the government was failing to deliver the overarchin­g environmen­t reform it announced in 2022. The Greens’ environmen­t spokespers­on, Sarah Hanson-Young, accused Labor of breaking a promise.

James Trezise, the director of the not-for-profit Biodiversi­ty Council, said the delay was a “significan­t step back from what the Albanese government committed to in its nature positive plan”.

“Nature in Australia is in crisis and can’t afford delays in the comprehens­ive reforms needed to fix our weak and broken environmen­tal laws,” he said.

Plibersek had initially promised to introduce new laws – first in draft form for consultati­on and then to the parliament – by last year.

Speaking in 2022, she said multiple reviews had shown the existing law, the Environmen­t Protection and Biodiversi­ty Conservati­on Act, was “broken”. She promised changes in 2023 that would be better for business and the environmen­t, including the introducti­on of national environmen­tal standards, faster decision-making and improved trust and integrity in the system.

But the plans have faced a public backlash from the Western Australian Labor premier, Roger Cook, and the state’s powerful mining and resources industries.

On Tuesday, Plibersek said splitting up the changes would allow more time for consultati­on and to “make sure we get this right”.

“When I first announced the nature-positive plan, I said it would take a bit of cooperatio­n, compromise and common sense to deliver. That’s exactly how we’re approachin­g the rollout,” she said.

Plibersek said the EPA legislatio­n would create an agency with “strong new powers to better protect nature”, including being able to issue environmen­t protection orders – effectivel­y “stop-work” orders. She said the laws would allow the EPA to act as a delegate for the minister and make decisions on whether developmen­t proposals went ahead.

The agency would initially be focused on cracking down on illegal land clearing and enforcing environmen­tal offsetting conditions. A government audit found about one in seven developmen­ts approved under the existing laws could be in breach of offset conditions that required some form of compensati­on in return for being allowed to damage nature.

Plibersek said the EPA chief would be an independen­t statutory appointmen­t similar to the Australian federal police commission­er “to make sure no government can interfere with the new agency’s important enforcemen­t work”. The agency would initially sit within the environmen­t department before becoming an independen­t statutory authority in July 2025.

Plibersek said the second new body, Environmen­t Informatio­n Australia, would release a national state of the environmen­t report every two years. Its primary role would be to provide “up-to-the-minute” informatio­n on Australia’s environmen­t to assist the public and business.

The Coalition’s environmen­t spokespers­on, Jonathon Duniam, said the announceme­nt showed Plibersek had failed as environmen­t minister, describing it as the creation of a “new bureaucrac­y with no new laws to administer”.

Hanson-Young said the changes did not go far enough to protect nature

and accused the government of giving in to a two-year-long campaign by “the mining industry and big developers”. She said the government was engaged in “piecemeal tinkering”, when it had promised a full environmen­t law reform package.

“Labor promised to fix Australia’s broken environmen­t laws, but without stopping native forest logging and fossil fuel expansions, the government will be failing to protect our planet and failing to keep its promise to the Australian people,” she said.

Conservati­on groups called on the government to deliver the promised full package of reform before the election and expressed disappoint­ment over the delays.

The Australian Conservati­on Foundation chief executive, Kelly O’Shanassy, said the promised crackdown on illegal land clearing and the establishm­ent of an EPA were “welcome and necessary”, but without comprehens­ive reform, the agency would be “enforcing a flawed and ineffectiv­e law that still needs serious surgery”.

Environmen­t groups are expected to air their concerns with the changes at a Senate inquiry hearing into the extinction crisis on Wednesday.

 ?? Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP ?? The environmen­t minister, Tanya Plibersek, had initially promised to introduce the new laws by last year.
Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP The environmen­t minister, Tanya Plibersek, had initially promised to introduce the new laws by last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia