The Saturday Paper

Jenny Erpenbeck

Not a Novel

- Michelle de Kretser

Granta, 186pp, $29.99

In 1919, contemplat­ing the wreckage of the European powers in the wake of a world war, Paul Valéry noted that “the abyss of history is deep enough to hold us all”. Seventy years later, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 was hailed as “the end of history” by a triumphali­st West.

Jenny Erpenbeck has published five remarkable works of fiction profoundly concerned with the past. Her novel Visitation focuses on a grand house in Brandenbur­g and its succession of occupants over the course of the 20th century. One of the most memorable chapters recounts the fate of a Jewish girl in a brilliant, 10-page distillati­on of the Holocaust.

In The End of Days, a cot death triggers a speculatio­n: what lives might a European woman have lived in the previous century, and what deaths might she have died? In its fascinatio­n with chance, the novel draws equally on fairytales and philosophy, but history remains a determinin­g factor. The woman’s lives are shaped by collective events.

Go, Went, Gone, Erpenbeck’s latest and most realist novel, takes the refugee crisis as its subject. Its protagonis­t, Richard, befriends a group of African refugees in Berlin. Like Erpenbeck herself, Richard has grown up in the socialist German Democratic Republic. He comes to see that what separates him from the Africans is only geopolitic­al luck.

When Richard’s world vanished with the Wall, the Bundesrepu­blik offered him a new life powered by deutschmar­ks and a fresh passport. The Africans, too, come from shattered worlds. One by one they describe the wars or environmen­tal catastroph­es that have driven them to seek asylum. But Germany is unwilling to rescue these victims of history’s bullying.

The fairytale is a significan­t form for Erpenbeck, as she acknowledg­es in Not a

Novel, her new nonfiction collection. If history were a fairytale written by capitalism, East Berlin would be a city placed under the evil spell of socialism and cut off from progress by the thorny hedge of its Wall. In the West, the GDR is perceived as a joyless, dreary place, a totalitari­an society founded on surveillan­ce and fear. That’s the dominant story – hits such as Stasiland and The Lives of Others attest to its pull.

Erpenbeck offers a counter-narrative, constructi­ng a different country from the rubble of the past. Some of the best essays here recount her “happy childhood”. East Berlin, with its “small-town sense of calm”, was a place where she felt “utterly safe”.

While recognisin­g the GDR’s failures, Erpenbeck misses a country where private property and advertisin­g didn’t exist, buying and selling meant little, and children weren’t taught that life is a competitio­n.

When the Wall came down, Erpenbeck was 22. In every life, the border between childhood and adulthood crumbles at some point. In Erpenbeck’s case, the collapse was a world-historical event that instantly made “a museum” of her past. It also made her a writer. She had studied opera directing, but five years after the Wall fell she began to write.

To say that Erpenbeck engages with history is to say that she engages with transforma­tion and time. Fairytales teach that change can be cruel. Erpenbeck’s two novellas centre on young women who have found the transition to adulthood traumatic. The protagonis­t of The Old Child pretends to be a schoolgirl and has herself admitted to a children’s home for reasons that are not disclosed. In The Book of Words, a woman who has grown up under a military dictatorsh­ip in South America learns as an adult that her father tortured political prisoners for a career.

Both women crave the safety of childhood: a country where rules are clear, an adored father is yet to be revealed as a monster, and dissidents thrown from a plane can be understood as strange birds falling through the sky.

One way to read these narratives is as a metaphor for Erpenbeck’s dismay at finding herself thrust into a Germany radiant with capitalism after the Wall fell. Among the “freedoms” that 1989 was said to bring, she notes the “freedom to shop” and asks: “What happens when we’re finished shopping?”

It’s a question that strikes to the heart of consumeris­m. It also points to what might be called innocence or trust or hope, but is in any case the legacy of a socialist upbringing. Erpenbeck knows that history never ends but she doesn’t know that capitalism renders her question meaningles­s. Any child reared in a market economy could tell her that shopping – like the impossible tasks heroes strive to complete in fairytales – never ends.

Erpenbeck’s narrative voice is direct, clear, bright and favours the present tense.

The combinatio­n brings folktales and proverbs to mind: the limpid surface, the hard truth underneath. It’s the voice of an old child, and Erpenbeck’s writing seems wise in an ancient and enduring way.

Not a Novel is an indispensa­ble complement to the fiction that has brought her acclaim across the world. It presents a grab bag of forms: personal essays, lectures, acceptance speeches and an obituary for a Nigerian refugee. The essays include Erpenbeck’s reflection­s on her literary influences: along with fairytales, Ovid’s Metamorpho­ses and opera (which freed her from “the compulsion to realism”).

Among the most potent pieces is “Open Bookkeepin­g”, written after the death of Erpenbeck’s mother. A catalogue of what her daughter inherited, it includes bills, a recipe for meatballs, the writer’s shoe size, her voice. The result is echt Erpenbeck: precise, unsentimen­tal, deeply affecting.

What former United States president Donald Trump called shitholes, Erpenbeck reclassifi­es as “blind spots”: places that are overlooked by the smug, oblivious West. She knew one intimately, experience­d what it was like to be one of the disregarde­d. It has led her to peer into the abyss of history, and describe what she sees there with electrifyi­ng clarity and compassion.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia