The Saturday Paper

‘I am hopeless now’: Australia’s $9.65 billion torture camps

As the Albanese government prepares to finalise a Nauru contract with an American prisons operator, the cost of the brutal enterprise has stretched into billions of dollars.

- Mike Seccombe is The Saturday Paper’s national correspond­ent.

Last year, the Morrison government spent at least $3.4 million making Ali’s life miserable. In the eight years prior to that, many, many more millions were spent imprisonin­g the young man who, as a 17-year-old fearing for his life, fled Afghanista­n and took a boat to what he hoped to be a better future in Australia, only to end up on Nauru.

The outcome of all that cruel spending is clear in his flat, uninflecte­d voice, coming down the bad line from the island on Tuesday. He says he wants to end his life but, in a way, his words suggest it has ended already. For what is life without hope?

“I am hopeless now,” he says.

Ali has given up on joining his uncle, who made it to Australia in 2001 and now is an Australian citizen. He has given up on his aspiration­s to go to university and find a job. He has given up on the prospect of resettleme­nt in any third country, given up imagining any future different from his present.

Putting aside the human cost of this system, the financial cost involved in the policy is extraordin­ary.

Since 2013, when then prime minister Kevin Rudd declared no asylum seeker who came here by boat without a visa would ever be settled in Australia, enormous sums have been spent on the offshore detention of people such as Ali.

Analysis of federal budgets by the Refugee Council of Australia shows total spending from July 2013, when Rudd made his vow, up to and including this year’s budget, is $9.65 billion.

The true cost is likely several billion dollars higher, according to analysis by the Kaldor Centre for Internatio­nal Refugee Law at UNSW Sydney, because it is unclear to what extent, if at all, it covers things such as aid and developmen­t assistance provided to Nauru and Papua New Guinea to secure their ongoing offshore processing agreement.

Nor does it appear to include the expense of detaining or meeting the needs of the more than 1100 people who have been transferre­d back to Australia on a temporary basis for medical or other reasons, charter flights and escorts between countries, and so

 ?? Robert Szymanski / Shuttersto­ck ?? An aerial shot of Nauru.
Robert Szymanski / Shuttersto­ck An aerial shot of Nauru.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia