The Weekly Advertiser Horsham

Budget delivers mixed result for ag

- – Shona Gawel

The Federal Budget delivered a mixed result for rural Australia with agricultur­e industry representa­tive organisati­ons both praising and criticisin­g commitment­s.

Leaders at Graingrowe­rs, a national farmer collective, welcomed a steadfast commitment to maintainin­g fuel tax credits and extra attention to childcare, but were disappoint­ed the government missed a range of valuable investment opportunit­ies for grain growers.

Graingrowe­rs chief executive Shona Gawel said additional funding for childcare was a welcome step forward.

“This funding addresses a range of issues affecting growers concerning childcare access,” she said.

“While it might not appear to be an obvious issue for the grains industry, preparatio­n is well underway for a rural and regional childcare roundtable to work through the issues and consider the next steps.”

Farmers for Climate Action leaders welcomed the announceme­nt of a $310 million small business energy incentive, to enable farm businesses to claim tax incentives for investment­s in on-farm batteries and electrific­ation.

Farmers for Climate Action chief executive Fiona Davis said farmers had called for incentives for farm batteries, which were required to make batteries viable.

“Giving farmers real incentives to invest in batteries has the potential to help reduce peak demand on our electricit­y grid, which could reduce the need for transmissi­on,” she said.

“Batteries currently come with 10-year payoff periods and five-year warranties, and until this is fixed, farmers are unlikely to invest in them.”

Dr Davis said a $38.3 million pledge for the Australian Bureau of Agricultur­al and Resource Economics to improve data collection and low-emission technology on agricultur­e, and $40.7 million for five years for farm extension officers was money re-purposed from existing funds.

“Farmers for Climate Action had called for more investment in extension officers and so welcomes this news, and calls for further investment in more extension officers,” she said.

Biosecurit­y protection

Dr Davis said the budget provided some helpful initiative­s, but greater investment in helping farmers tackle climate change was needed.

Ms Gawel said as grain production was a powerhouse commodity, Australian growers deserved more investment in areas including biosecurit­y, infrastruc­ture investment and taxation.

She said the decision to impose a biosecurit­y protection levy on producers was disappoint­ing, because farmers were not risk creators and could now be facing undue costs.

“The Agricultur­e Minister, Murray Watt, only recently endorsed an independen­t report by the Invasive Species Council that suggested the people who create the biosecurit­y risks need to pay their fair share,” she said.

“The imposition of what the government believes is a ‘modest levy’ is neither fair or well directed and we would respectful­ly ask the government to reconsider such a short-sighted decision.”

Ms Gawel said road funding was another disappoint­ment and while some funding had been allocated, it was a drop in the ocean compared to what was needed.

“While we understand the financial constraint­s facing the government, decimated rural roads are driving up inflation and putting regional drivers at risk,” she said.

“With climate change increasing, we need urgent investment to ensure the resilience of road networks.

“Rural roads must not be left behind in Australia’s $120 billion infrastruc­ture investment pipeline.”

Ms Gawel said the decision to reduce the instant asset write-off to $20,000 – capped at $10 million turnover – was a ‘glasshalf-empty’ approach.

“In the feedback we’ve received from growers, they have been looking to the government to provide a solid incentive to invest in the machinery required to gain efficienci­es and improve productivi­ty,” she said.

“Given the persistent delays and global shortages in accessing machinery, an extension would have enabled farmers to receive the current machinery and assets on order.” “Rural roads must not be left behind in Australia’s $120 billion infrastruc­ture investment pipeline”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia