Unique Cars

GETTING GOING

THE CAR THAT STARTED THE LEGEND

- WORDS DR JOHN WRIGHT PHOTOS HOLDEN/UNIQUE CARS ARCHIVES

My PhD, which became the book Special: theuntold

story of Australia’s Holden, unpacks the genealogy of the Holden car. It was a stor y previously untold, despite the many accounts that have been written. Arguably, no other car in histor y has been so carefully conceived for a unique set of circumstan­ces as the Holden 48-215 was. First, it had to suit the very demanding – essentiall­y pioneering – conditions imposed by Australia. Second, it had to showcase General Motors’ internatio­nal knowhow to the watching postwar world.

Three major wars – the Boer War (1899-1902), World War One (1914-18) and World War Two (1939-45) shaped the Australian automotive industry. In the Boer War, the partnershi­p of (James Alexander) Holden & (Henry Adolph) Frost supplied military equipment such as harnesses to the government. By the end of the Boer War, Holden & Frost was the government’s biggest supplier of harnesses and saddlery.

The Great War provided the catalyst which turned the motor body-building business from a sideline in to a major secondary industry. In 1917, with German U-boat activity making ocean transport treacherou­s and cargo space at a premium, the government banned the import of beer, furs and car bodies under the curiously named ‘Luxury Restrictio­ns’ tax. Car bodies would have to be made here for all imported chassis. Holden & Frost had built its first custom body in 1916 for a Hotchkiss motor car owned by an Adelaide publican. Other orders followed. But under the new imperative, Holden Motor Body Builders (HMBB) was formed in 1919. By May 1923 HMBB was producing 340 bodies per week.

Holden’s main client was General Motors Export Company (GMEC), anxious to secure a guaranteed supply of high quality bodies. By then the company was exporting 9500 chassis per year to Australia, about 17 per cent of the market. Two GMEC executives visited Australia in 1923 and recommende­d setting up a joint venture with HMBB.

GMEC would fund a new plant in Woodville exclusivel­y to produce bodies for GM cars, while HMBB could continue making bodies for other makes in its existing plant in King William Street. With Woodville at capacity, GM’s share of the Australian market climbed from 16.9 per cent in 1923 to 31.4 per cent by 1925.

Then the Great Depression arrived with full force in 1930. On 14 February the directors of HMBB agreed to a GM takeover. January 1931 saw just 762 bodies being built but in March 1928 HMBB had produced 5897.

Englishman Laurence J. (‘Larry’) Hartnett took over as managing director of the new company, General MotorsHold­en’s in 1934. From early on, Hartnett was keen to build the entire car in Australia. His bosses at GM, under the entreprene­urial genius Alfred P. Sloan, Jr, were on the same page, even though Sloan took quite a dislike to the cocky Englishman.

World War Two then changes the equation. From 1940 GM-H manufactur­ed the machinery of war, which included internal combustion engines. This was a major step towards being able to manufactur­e the complete car.

Extraordin­arily, the other huge element came out of General Motors’ experience in Nazi Germany. Hitler came to power on 30 January 1933, largely on a promise to restore Germany as a

“GOVERNMENT BANNED IMPORTS OF BEER, FURS AND CAR BODIES UNDER THE CURIOUSLY NAMED LUXURY RESTRICTIO­NS TAX”

great power. But there was little chance of him achieving his ultimate goal of world dominance without first reviving the domestic economy.

Less than a fortnight later, Hitler’s first important public role was to open the Berlin Motor Show. His speech focused on the need for a brilliant roads network, a People’s Car and the demonstrat­ion of German technologi­cal dominance through internatio­nal motorsport.

General Motors’ German subsidiary Opel headed the German car sales charts. When Hitler announced the removal of sales ta x on all new cars, Opel was the greatest beneficiar y. Unpreceden­ted economies of scale driven by a dramatic increase in sales allowed Opel to develop radical new technolog y. American engineer Russell S Begg, an industry veteran and expert on all-steel bodies, was sent to Germany in 1934.

Begg introduced monocoque constructi­on to Opel. First came the Olympia, displayed at the Berlin show in 1936 and named for Hitler’s Olympic Games of that year. Here was the world’s first mass-production monocoque, a car both lighter and stronger than its rivals. The Olympia was immediatel­y successful in Germany and other European markets.

Equally significan­t for the stor y of the Holden is the luxurious 1938 Opel Kapitän, the first GM car to combine a six-cylinder engine with monocoque constructi­on.

These two Opels set the template for mass-produced small and medium cars in the postwar era, rendering body-on-frame constructi­on no longer viable, except for larger vehicles.

The Kapitän may be seen as the true predecesso­r of the Holden 48-215. But another car needs to be mentioned, Project 195-Y-15. This uncharisma­tically named experiment­al vehicle was one of a pair, the other being 195-Y-13. The experiment was conducted under Begg’s charge in Germany when the Kapitän program was in its final stages, the idea being to determine whether a four-cylinder or six-cylinder engine worked better in a car of around 2000 pounds weight (908 kg). The six, which brought the car to a total of 945 kg, won decisively; it cost little more to build, used barely more fuel and imposed less strain on its three-speed gearbox.

“BEGG SET ITS MAXIMUM POWER AT 60HP, FOR A TOP SPEED OF 80MPH (128KM/H)”

Both vehicles were shipped to the US immediatel­y before the outbreak of war; GM’s German investment looked to be imperilled. In 1942 Opel became a one-off tax loss.

In October 1944 the GM Board agreed to the manufactur­e of an Australian car but required GM-H to fund it. Prime Minister Ben Chif ley persuaded the banks to supply the funds at commercial rates of interest, the loans to be repaid by GM-H.

Russ Begg was appointed chief engineer of the just approved Australian Car Program (195Y25, no hyphens), reporting to Walter Appel, chief engineer of General Motors Overseas Operations (GMOO). He took 195-Y-15 as the starting point, while doubtless conscious of his Kapitän, which was very successful.

Begg and Appel had difference­s about the suitabilit­y of 195-Y-15 as the basis for the new Australian car, but Begg always prevailed. Appel thought 195Y25 should be heavier, while Begg was determined to keep the weight down. Neverthele­ss, he was caught between Appel’s scepticism at higher executive level and the pressures from within his own engineerin­g team to incorporat­e this or that weight-adding feature. And Russ Begg had yet to meet GM-H managing director, Larry Hartnett, who would continue to try to inf luence the design direction of 195Y25 – mostly to little effect.

On 7 August 1945, the boss of GMOO, Edward C Riley, wrote to Harnett:

I am not willing… to plonk down our blue chips on the production of this, our first car, on the basis of such design… I just cannot put our money on your crowd for this first job.

While Begg knew the prototype would require great finessing, he was developing his own unique philosophy about the interrelat­ionship between performanc­e, economy, durability and weight. His thinking is made clear in a fascinatin­g letter from GM-H’s technical liaison officer in Detroit, George Quarry, to Hartnett:

Russ, Kuip [G.C.R. Kuiper, chief experiment­al engineer under Begg] and I were out in the Kapitän sedan which, while weighing 2676lb [1214kg] curb, with a 150.9 cubic motor on a 106.1” [2695mm] wheelbase, has very similar internal space and performanc­e factor as our job (actually

90.3 compared with our 90.1). I told Russ that I felt that Australia would have accepted a somewhat reduced performanc­e factor, especially if it had a beneficial effect on weight and cost; his reply was that such a move is quite in the other direction, as any substantia­lly lower performanc­e factor means a different and heavier transmissi­on to handle the greatly increased second gear work.

By October 1946 any thoughts of a less powerful engine had vanished. Begg had set maximum of 60 horsepower which would deliver a top speed identical to that of the Autobahn-storming Kapitän – 80 miles per hour (128 km/h). The Holden 48-215 was emerging from a very long tunnel!

Under Begg, there was never any prospect of the Holden’s having a four-cylinder engine. But interestin­gly, GM’s British subsidiar y Vauxhall offered its Holden-size E-Class as a four-cylinder Wyvern and six-cylinder Velox, while Ford of Britain did the same with its Consul and Zephyr – truly, 195-Y-13 and 195-Y-15 had reached Europe!

The merits of the 48-215 have been written about seemingly endlessly. But with its combinatio­n of great torque for easy overtaking, fuel economy of 30 miles per gallon, simplicity of design, ease of repair, ubiquity of spare parts, room for five adults and their luggage, top speed of 80 miles per hour, low purchase price, great durability and high ground clearance, ‘Australia’s Own Car’ out of GMOO was unique in the late 1940s.

As for the imperative for an Australian car, the mood changed between late 1944 and 29 November 1948 when the Holden was launched. The Cold War was escalating; during his speech, Chif ley spoke much more about the imminent war than he did about the car – ‘a beauty’, he called it.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? BELOW The six-cylinder Opel Kapitan proves monocoque is also a winner for larger, Holden-size, cars.
BELOW The six-cylinder Opel Kapitan proves monocoque is also a winner for larger, Holden-size, cars.
 ?? ?? ABOVE Russell Begg’s fourcylind­er Opel Olympia pioneers the monocoque approach.
ABOVE Russell Begg’s fourcylind­er Opel Olympia pioneers the monocoque approach.
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? ABOVE Prime Minister Ben Chifley sees ‘Job #1’ 48-215 officially off-line in 1948.
ABOVE Prime Minister Ben Chifley sees ‘Job #1’ 48-215 officially off-line in 1948.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia