VOGUE Australia

Notes on a scandal

My Dark Vanessa was one of the most anticipate­d novels of 2020, following a seven-figure advance and celebrity endorsemen­ts. But it’s become equally as controvers­ial, thanks to its narrative about an abusive teacher-student relationsh­ip. Author Kate Eliza

- By Kate Elizabeth Russell (HarperColl­ins) and Lionel Shriver’s latest novel, (HarperColl­ins), are available now.

My Dark Vanessa is a pretty shade of peach. It is the kind of cover that would beautify a bedside table. Or ask to be Instagramm­ed. But 50 pages into this debut novel by American author Kate Elizabeth Russell, I find myself shutting it in a drawer between readings so I don’t have to think about it. For a day, I can’t find it and I am glad – the story unfolding behind that bright cover is so dark, and relentless­ly harrowing. One critic said it was an “exquisite, often nauseating” novel. Another called it a story that “unmoors you from your lived reality, grips the very core of you and doesn’t let go”. Which is why, the next day, I’m franticall­y searching for it, because I have to know the ending.

It starts with Vanessa Wye, who’s in her 30s, reading a Facebook post by a former student of the prestigiou­s boarding school she attended, publicly accusing an English teacher of abuse. Aged 15, Vanessa was drawn into a sexual relationsh­ip with that teacher, Jacob Strane, who was then 42. The charge laid against him forces her to re-examine the nature of their affair, to determine whether it was love, as she has always believed, or if it was abuse, perpetuate­d over years. The first shock in the novel is the fact it is not over.

The plot and the events portrayed as Vanessa’s narrative flick-flacks between past and present were always going to inflame opinion. Ten thousand readers had rated the book on Goodreads within a month of it being published in March this year; whether they awarded one star or five, the word “disturbing” appears in their reviews with a striking frequency.

But even before it came out, My Dark Vanessa was being hailed as the most anticipate­d and controvers­ial novel of 2020. The initial blaze of publicity had been sparked by the size of Russell’s advance – seven figures for an unheard-of, first-time author who had who been rejected by more than 60 publishers and agents in the few months she’d been shopping her manuscript, before it was bought in 2018.

THE COVER OF

It was stoked by the slew of high-profile endorsemen­ts that followed. Gone Girl author Gillian Flynn described the book as brilliant and stunning; Marian Keyes called it “powerful, compulsive” and Stephen King, who provided a blurb, said it was “a package of dynamite”. Kristen Roupenian, the writer of the 2017 viral New Yorker short story Cat Person, called My Dark Vanessa “a total masterpiec­e”.

In 2019, still unpublishe­d, it was chosen for Oprah’s Book Club, then dropped. No explanatio­n was given, although in between Russell had been accused of plagiarism by another author on Twitter. That claim was reportedly unfounded, but, according to one of Russell’s defenders, New York magazine writer Lila Shapiro, it acted like “a match dropped onto a haystack soaked in gasoline”.

With literary Twitter now aware of the novel, it demanded to know if Russell had based it on her own life. The debate ensued: must an author have personal experience of a subject, especially a sensitive one, to be entitled to the narrative?

“I knew that was going to come into play,” Russell tells Vogue Australia, “that the book being released would ignite this interest in my personal life.” As “an older millennial” who had grown up on social media, “I had experience of how these conversati­ons play out online, and nothing really surprised me in terms of the shape of the conversati­on”.

Still, to go from an unknown “writing in total obscurity and earning $14,000 a year” to becoming a millionair­e at the centre of a publishing furore in such a short space of time, Russell admits, “was really, really intense and disorienti­ng”. And it was tough, she says, “to sit by and watch yourself be the centre of it, trying to keep a little perspectiv­e and remember that it will pass, but it sucks when you’re in the middle”.

Russell had already made public the fact that while she had drawn inspiratio­n from her experience­s as a teenager and had had relationsh­ips with older men, My Dark Vanessa was not a veiled memoir. Neverthele­ss, she says, “I felt like these things I’d

epiphany. Instead, she equivocate­s. So maybe it was rape. But not “rape rape”. She desired him, she finds him disgusting. Complicit, coerced. Powerless, the one with all the power. There is a feeling of being spun, almost to the point of sickness, by Vanessa’s constantly shifting perception.

And instead of joining her teacher’s chorus of accusers, Vanessa rejects the idea of victimhood. Which is why, to some readers, the ‘Lolita of our time’ label is harder to apply.

Vanessa does not fit into a post-#MeToo paradigm, our new perception of who a victim is and what she is meant to do. “It is a really difficult thing to wrap your head around why someone in Vanessa’s position would be so loyal to someone as awful to Strane,” says Russell.

Equally as problemati­c is the fact Russell doesn’t step in to provide a moral conclusion at the end. She never tells us what to think, or what she thinks about her protagonis­t’s story.

As she sees it, her only creative obligation was to tell the story. Her only responsibi­lity or wish as a writer is to spark conversati­on about the complexity of sexual violence. As her statement read: “I believe novels can help create space for readers to unpack and talk about sensitive or difficult topics.”

In that she is not alone. Author Lionel Shriver’s 2003 novel We Need To Talk About Kevin, about a school massacre, ignited the same kind of controvers­y. “Fiction is the ideal form in which to explore uncomforta­ble subject matter, because it can go at touchy subjects from multiple and even contradict­ory perspectiv­es, and we traditiona­lly allow characters to think and feel things that they’re not ‘supposed’ to,” Shriver tells Vogue.

“Unfortunat­ely,” she continues, “in recent times, we have increasing­ly imputed to the author any views or feelings that a writer ascribes to characters, so that characters have to adhere to strict social norms just like the rest of us. This is critically wrongheade­d and literarily catastroph­ic. It leads not only to bad art, but to the loss of a vital ‘safe space’ for the honest examinatio­n of difficult material.”

It was never Russell’s job to tidy things up and make Vanessa fit our model, Shriver believes. “Novelists have no moral responsibi­lity to their audience. Novelists create their own worlds and their own rules, and between their own book covers can do what they bloody well want.”

That is what Russell has done, with immense originalit­y. Whether she has written the new Lolita or just let Vanessa speak, and whether subject matter so innately uncomforta­ble makes good fiction is for her audience to decide. But whether readers leave it out or hide it away, the most controvers­ial novel of this year will not easily fade from mind. My Dark Vanessa

The Motion of the Body Through Space

Vanessa does not fit into a post-#MeToo paradigm, our new perception of who a victim is and what she is meant to do … and Russell doesn’t step in to provide a moral conclusion at the end

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia