Weekend Gold Coast Bulletin

HOW TO STOP BUCKPASSIN­G

-

FRUSTRATIO­NS of boaties and residents in dealing with multiple agencies that have responsibi­lity for Gold Coast waterways are summed up in examples highlighte­d in our special report today on marine red tape.

In one case, Labrador resident Rick Sullivan tells of an incident last year in which he tried to report pollution floating in the Broadwater. He contacted what he thought was the correct marine authority and was asked if it had reached the shore. When he said yes, the voice on the end of the phone said the matter was therefore the city council’s responsibi­lity.

Readers who study the waterways authority chart that accompanie­s our report, explaining the functions of each of the 11 agencies, will note the council only has responsibi­lity if the pollution is land sourced, so what Mr Sullivan encountere­d was an exemplary piece of buckpassin­g.

And that is the problem. Whether intentiona­l or by accident or through ignorance, this sort of buckpassin­g is inevitable when there are 11 separate bodies supposedly in charge of various aspects of the Gold Coast’s waterways.

Responsibi­lity has to be streamline­d. It cannot be reduced to a single agency – police, for example, must control speed limits and be on the lookout for boaties who are under the influence of liquor, while dredging approvals are obviously the role of other agencies including the council. But there is considerab­le overlap in several areas and this can only lead to confusion and a mountain of bureaucrac­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia