Weekend Gold Coast Bulletin

POOR RESEARCH OPENS DOOR FOR ILL-INFORMED

- ANN WASON MOORE ann.wasonmoore@news.com.au

WHAT do 5G conspiraci­sts, anti-vaxxers and Pete Evans all have in common?

The obvious answer is they are blind to facts and deaf to science, but the truly frightenin­g common factor is they all have been given the oxygen to survive via gaps in medical research.

Just like one little viral droplet can find a chink in one human’s immune system and shut down the world and destroy global economies, the conspiraci­sts, fantasists and fanatics can find popular support by targeting any holes in our health fraternity’s evidenceba­sed armour.

And unfortunat­ely, it seems some of our medicos are doing the hard work for them through poor research.

That’s not my opinion, but the facts – as discussed by Bond University professor of evidence-based medicine Paul Glasziou, professor of clinical epidemiolo­gy Tammy Hoffmann and assistant professor Sharon Sanders.

The trio of brainiacs (my own technical terminolog­y) published an editorial in The BMJ this week describing how “a deluge of poor quality research is sabotaging an effective evidence-based response’’ to COVID-19.

Case in point: hydroxychl­oroquine.

You know, the malaria drug espoused by US President Donald Trump and then bought by the barrel by our own Trump-wannabe Clive Palmer (who no doubt spent as much advertisin­g the fact he bought the drugs as he did actually buying them). Well, that drug first came to the media’s attention (and therefore Trump’s), thanks to preprints. Preprints allow early access to study results, and “early’’ can often mean “flawed’’.

As our Bond Uni brainiacs reported in The BMJ: “Access to preprints has led to irresponsi­ble disseminat­ion as flawed studies are picked up by the media.

“The preprint of the first reported study of hydroxychl­oroquine on March 20, 2020 – a nonrandomi­sed study of 46 patients with inappropri­ate analyses – has been cited 520 times, while a larger, randomised trial of hydroxychl­oroquine posted on MedRxiv on April 14 showing no benefits has received far less attention.

“The unbalanced media attention to the first study has triggered a wave of what is likely to be largely unnecessar­y or misdirecte­d research: 135 hydroxychl­oroquine studies have been registered on ClinicalTr­ials.gov since March 20.”

Meanwhile, how many trials have been undertaken into non-drug interventi­ons like social distancing – you know, our primary weapon against the pandemic – to prevent the spread of COVID-19?

Exactly none. “Given the risk that a vaccine may be ineffectiv­e, partially effective, or delayed, there is an urgent need for a body similar to CEPI (the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedne­ss Innovation­s) that could co-ordinate and support neglected research into non-drug interventi­ons such as distancing, hand hygiene, masks, tracing and environmen­tal modificati­ons, which have so far been the only effective means of control,” the Bond trio wrote.

Unfortunat­ely, this tendency towards poor research is not a new phenomenon, but it is growing worse.

“Before the pandemic, it was estimated that up to 85 per cent of research was wasted because of poor questions, poor study design, inefficien­cy of regulation and conduct, and non or poor reporting of results,’’ they wrote.

“Many of these problems are amplified in COVID-19 research, with time pressures and inadequate research infrastruc­ture contributi­ng.

“While the poor quality of COVID-19 research needs attention immediatel­y, other problems must be addressed long-term, and certainly before the next pandemic.”

Indeed, poor research and the early release of flawed study results mean we are playing into the hands of Pete Evans and his merry band of activated nuts.

By their rhetoric, if they can poke a hole in one medical argument, in any one aspect of so-called traditiona­l medicine, they can convince a segment of a frightened public to disregard the entire system, including the very best of evidenceba­sed medicine that literally saves lives.

It may well be a logical fallacy, but to many it simply seems like logic.

I hate to ask any more of our health workers and scientists, given the incredible weight of both responsibi­lity and expectatio­ns on their shoulders, but that is exactly why we can’t afford for them to stumble now.

We need to build our immunity against false conspiraci­sts and peddlers of snake oil medicine (aka Paleo Pete’s BioCharger).

Solid medical research is one of the best forms of defence.

 ??  ?? Malaria drug hydroxychl­oroquine has been promoted by Donald Trump as a cure for COVID-19.
Malaria drug hydroxychl­oroquine has been promoted by Donald Trump as a cure for COVID-19.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia