Queen’s letters to GG can go public

A DECADE since finding them in the archive, historian Jenny Hocking hopes to finally lift the lid next week on a box of letters between the Queen and the governor-general who dismissed Gough Whitlam.

The High Court has ruled the 211 letters should be accessible to the public and ordered the National Archives to reassess Professor Hocking’s request to read them.

The judgment handed down yesterday comes after a four-year legal battle, and a decade since Prof Hocking first sought access. She says the archives must now release them immediately.

“I would anticipate that the archives is more than ready to have those documents available for me ... next Monday and I’ll be able to sit down and start going through them,” she told reporters in Melbourne.

“I would be horrified if they did (deny access) given the four-year legal case. Unless it has the Queen’s medical details in it, you would expect them to be released.”

The so-called palace letters between Buckingham Palace and Sir John Kerr about the time of the 1975 dismissal had been deemed personal communications by the National Archives of Australia and the Federal Court.

That meant they couldn’t be released until 2027, and only then with the permission of the Queen.

But a majority of the High Court’s full bench has ruled they are in fact commonwealth property. “A ‘Commonwealth record’ within the care of the archives must be made available for public access once the record is within the ‘open access period’,” the judgment from Chief Justice Susan Kiefel and Justices Virginia Bell, Stephen Gageler and Patrick Keane says.

In the case of the letters, that period is 31 years after creation, meaning they should have become public in 2006.

I WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT THE ARCHIVES IS MORE THAN READY TO HAVE THOSE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE ... NEXT MONDAY

PROF JENNY HOCKING

Justice Geoffrey Nettle made a dissenting judgment, saying the letters should not be deemed commonwealth property simply because Sir John held public office.

Prof Hocking said the ruling could have implications for other correspondence between the Queen and governors held in state archives.

It has been hailed by the Australian Republican Movement as a win for Australian sovereignty.

“The Palace has claimed it had no involvement in the (dismissal) decision. This will put that to the test,” chair Peter FitzSimons said.

Labor also welcomed the decision.