Why do people take pleasure in attacking Amber?
People seem to love a story where a person who we might traditionally think of as a victim is instead cast as the perpetrator. False accusations, female-on-male domestic violence, “anti-white discrimination”; stories like these are shared and pored over with a sense of glee that you don’t really see in the tens of thousands of cases where the roles are reversed. One of the more famous examples of this from the past few years was the 2019 case of African American actor Jussie Smollet, who in early 2019 claimed that he had been assaulted by two masked men in an alleged hate crime. Smollet claimed that the men had placed a rope around his neck and made reference to Donald Trump’s MAGA catchphrase, painting a clear picture of a racially-motivated atack, spurred on by a climate of intolerance encouraged by the former president.
While prominent liberal celebrities initially jumped to Smollet’s defence to condemn the supposed atack, it didn’t take long for the truth to come out: Smollet had faked the whole thing, and rather than seeking justice for the incident, would instead himself be brought to court for perpetrating a hoax. Smollet’s case has a surprising number of parallels with that of Amber Heard, who is currently in a legal batle with ex-husband Johnny Depp over allegations of domestic abuse.
As was the case with Smollet, there was an initial groundswell of support for Heard – which was quickly replaced with fury as it emerged that she may have been equally, and perhaps even entirely, antagonistic towards Depp. And, as with Smollet, Heard’s public image has quickly transformed from being a poster girl for speaking out against male violence, to complete persona non grata among her former supporters.
The most insidious parallel between the two, however, is more to do with the way that the public discourse around their respective cases has developed. When Smollet’s hoax was revealed, it wasn’t really considered in isolation. Unlike Heard, Smollet wasn’t particularly famous for his work as an actor before the incident, so discussions quickly moved on from the specifics of his case to the wider culture of racially-motivated violence in America.
Those discussions were oten predictably harmful to the cause of social justice, with many using the incident as a stick to beat over the head anybody who suggested that racial violence was an issue, or that hate crimes should be treated as categorically different from other types of assault. Trump himself even weighed in, tweeting, “what about MAGA and the tens of millions of people you insulted with your racist and dangerous comments?”
Incidents of hate crimes did rise under Trump. Of course they did. Racist, inflammatory rhetoric was his bread and buter for the entire course of his presidency. But that didn’t mater, because Smollet had already given him the high ground, and ample opportunity to paint himself as a victim and cry anti-white racism.
Comedian Paton Oswalt said it best when he responded to Trump, tweeting, “Way to go Jussie. You just handed this racist dipshit a ‘Get Out Of Race-baiting Free’ card that he’s gonna wave around like a soiled diaper until he’s re-elected.”
We’re seeing something very similar to this in Heard’s case, with many people taking real, genuine pleasure in denigrating the Aquaman star. On forums like Reddit and Facebook, serious discussion of Heard’s case oten gives way to comment chains of people repeating the phrase “f**k Amber Heard” over and over, or simply using misogynistic profanity to describe her.