Sam Raimi on ‘Doctor Strange’ and his superhero return
NEW YORK: Relief was just starting to wash over director Sam Raimi the morning ater the premiere of “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” The film, which opens in theatres on Friday, has been a headlong sprint for the 62-year-old, who took over two and a half years ago ater Scot Derrickson departed the project over creative differences. Raimi had a script to retool but an unmovable shooting timeline to meet. “Every part of this moviemaking process has been great, but every part of the process went on too long and became a litle too intense,” explained Raimi, speaking by Zoom from Los Angeles. “I love the writing but the writing never stopped. Michael (Waldron) was writing the script all throughout the production. And the shoot was great but then we had to do reshoots. Also because of COVID, things got stretched out.”
“But it’s been great,” added Raimi. Even if his reentry was rushed, Marvel’s “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness,” which kicks off Hollywood’s summer movie season, has heralded the return of one the movies’ most beloved genre filmmakers. Raimi crated the microbudget horror landmark “The Evil Dead” (and its more comic cult-classic sequels, “The Evil Dead 2” and “Army of Darkness”) before his Spider-man films, with Tobey Maguire, helped pave the way for the superhero era that followed. And, somewhat miraculously, the latest “Doctor Strange” is an identifiably SAM Raimi film, full of playful horror, clever comic touches and bonkers flashes. He brings some madness to the multiverse.
This film bears many hallmarks of your work: Bruce Campbell, a book of the dead and even, briefly, shots from a demon’s point-of-view. Do you feel like you smuggled a SAM Raimi film into a Marvel movie?
I was really trying to make a Marvel movie, first and foremost. I guess everyone does things their own way, without trying to specifically make it something other than what it was. I was really just trying to follow the characters from the previous Marvel movies and storylines from “Wandavision” had led into and where all the “Avengers” movies had led into. But also try to open up the multiverse as Marvel had requested of writer Michael Waldron for future adventures.
Do you feel that these films, like any other kind, should bear the fingerprints of their filmmakers?
I think the first responsibility is to tell the story of those characters because this is, like, episode 27. But I think it’s great that filmmakers can do it from their own perspective as long as they’re working within the Marvel box, basically. And it’s a very big sandbox to play in. What they do at Marvel is they really protect the integrity of the characters. So long as you’re doing that and as long as you’re aware of the story elements so you don’t disappoint the fans, I think it’s great that filmmakers in the Marvel
Universe exercise their personality and style and tell the story with their own sense of panache.
I think of the “Evil Dead” movies and “Army of Darkness,” in part, as odes to practical effects. This is the other end of the spectrum, with extensive, anything’s-possible CGI. How did you adapt?
I love practical effects. That’s my favorite thing to do on set and it’s my favorite thing to watch in movies. But the nature of this movie was so big, to travel through the multiverse, the techniques were not really befiting of practical effects, the major techniques. There are moments for them in this movie but really it had to be computer generated because of the scope and the amount of journey our characters went on. It just would have been too expensive and impractical to do it practically. I love practical effects but they take time. With a giant production like this, it’s difficult to shoot take ater take because the blood tube is showing in frame or the wire is floating.