Botswana Guardian

Mushroomin­g of unplanned mini townships worrisome

Farmers sell their fertile land chasing after riches Land boards will not be able to acquire land for equitable distributi­on to Batswana

- Dikarabo Ramadubu BG reporter

Some residents have been found to abuse the citizen empowermen­t land dispensati­on and in the process compromise the food security potential of the eastern corridor.

Batswana may optimally utilise land they possess by introducin­g other economic empowering activities on up to 50 percent of their agricultur­al land.

This was introduced by President Dr. Mokgweetsi Masisi in 2018 to empower citizens with the most precious commodity that they have- land.

But, sadly some Batswana are subdividin­g their land into small plots while others sub divide their fields ( masimo) into the minimum requiremen­t of 1ha portions and transfer them with the intention of benefiting more from the said fields especially where Land Boards have provision for in- kind compensati­on.

At the rate at which such sales are taking place, it is evidently clear that in future Land Boards will not manage to acquire land for equitable distributi­on to Batswana.

This turn of events also threatens the food security as it reduces the already scarce productive agricultur­al land that exists in the country. The eastern part of the country boasts the most fertile agricultur­al land.

The Revised Developmen­t Control Code allows Integrated Agricultur­al Farming ancillary use provision of up to 50 percent of the total area of the land parcel.

It says that supporting agricultur­al developmen­ts and, or activities up to 50 percent considered as ancillary to agricultur­al land use, do not constitute change of land use.

Ancillary developmen­ts of up to 50 percent of Agricultur­al Land would be considered mixed use and would require change of land use.

The pol i c y states that the developmen­t control code and other related instrument­s have been amended to allow changes and no piece of agricultur­al land shall be subdivided without the permission of the planning authority. Non- Agricultur­e related developmen­ts of up to 50 percent should be allowed as mixed use. Minimum lot size allowed for Intensive Agricultur­al/ National Agricultur­al Production Zone is 4ha, while minimum lot size for Extensive Agricultur­al Zone/ Ordinary ploughing fields ( masimo) is 1ha. This was pronounced by instrument No147 of 2019.

Speaking in an exclusive interview, the ministeria­l management team composed of all Department­al Directors and led by Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Land Management, Water and Sanitation services, Bonolo Khumotaka, shared their views, experience­s, concerns and specific amendments regarding the subject matter.

What is clear is that the subdivisio­ns and changes of land use to nonagricul­tural uses by some residents pose several challenges which could leave many poor in the long term, and cause mushroomin­g of unplanned settlement­s and villages.

Although the guidelines state that the plot holders or masimo owners should take the responsibi­lity of the cost of infrastruc­ture and other services in accordance with the management team, there is no commitment of such and the problem will still go back to government as it is that population who are also taxpayers who will demand infrastruc­ture and services in future.

The Director at the Department of Town and Country Planning, Eunice Mmono said it is important to bear in mind that the land in question is Tribal Land - ploughing fields ( masimo) which were allocated on customary grant for subsistenc­e purposes.

It should be borne in mind that fertile agricultur­al land resides on the eastern corridor of Botswana and that production on that land is important to feed the urban populace which also concentrat­es on the same belt.

Mmono explained that the overall goal of the Revised Botswana Land Policy of 2019 is to protect and promote land rights of all land holders and promote sustainabl­e human settlement­s.

She said it is clear that the sub division and subsequent disposal of land are clearly at variance with the overall goal of the Land policy.

“Batswana are increasing­ly dispossess­ing themselves of their land rights for short term gains. They temporaril­y empower themselves financiall­y which has proved not to be sustainabl­e and government needs to protect these rights”.

She fears that the haphazard and indiscrimi­nate mushroomin­g of settlement­s will grow without the requisite comprehens­ive planning and provision of infrastruc­ture services.

She said in as much as the guidelines suggest that landowners should provide for services, lessons learnt from areas such as Gaborone North are examples of such.

These will eventually come back to demand that government should provide such services, as the occupants being Batswana and tax payers will rightfully deserve such eventualit­y.

What puts government in an awkward position is that in some cases transfers are done by the Sub- land boards which do not have jurisdicti­on.

Botswana Guardian has learnt that the current legal position is that any sub- divisions attempted pursuant to these permission­s can be rejected by Surveyor General and Registrar of Deeds.

Mmono explained that it is clear that the planning of Tribal Land and changes thereto is the exclusive domain of the main Land Board. In the present case, change of land use permission­s was granted by the sub- land board.

She said in that case such permission­s are not lawful as the sub land board lacked jurisdicti­on. The Sub Land Board must be instructed to inform the public that it lacked jurisdicti­on and therefore the permission­s granted are invalid.

The Land Board can apply to court to declare any certificat­es issued thereto as unlawful and invalid.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana