Mmegi

IEC rekindles minimum qualificat­ions debate

- CHAKALISA DUBE Staff Writer

FRANCISTOW­N: Political analysts have weighed in on the debate as to whether there should be minimum education for aspiring Members of Parliament (MPs) and councillor­s..

The Independen­t Electoral Commission (IEC) recently reignited the debate, having made, amongst some recommenda­tions to Cabinet, that there should be mandatory educationa­l qualificat­ions for councillor­s and MPS. The recommenda­tions formed part of contributi­ons from various stakeholde­rs on how to enhance the country’s democracy.

There is a popular debate that having a political system that prescribes a minimum educationa­l qualificat­ion for politician­s might deliver leaders who are able to effectivel­y tackle various challenges in the country. The low quality of debate in Parliament and at the council chambers has mainly been attributed to a political system that allows voters to vote for less academical­ly sound leaders. Many believe that the trend could be curtailed by allowing voters to choose from a pool composed entirely of educated candidates.

Those against having a set of academic requiremen­ts for political leaders argue that having such requiremen­ts is discrimina­tory. Their reasoning is that sometimes there is no correlatio­n between academic qualificat­ion and effective representa­tion.

They say that examples are abound with superior performanc­es by those deemed to be less educated. Those are against academic qualificat­ions for politician­s also argue that, political knowledge is more important than academic qualificat­ions. According to them what is important in politics, amongst other considerat­ions, are leadership skills and emotional intelligen­ce.

Political analyst Adam Mfundisi who is a lecturer in political and administra­tive studies at the University of Botswana equivocate­d on the matter, electing to agree or disagree with suggestion­s that there should be mandatory academic requiremen­ts for aspiring councillor­s and MPs.

He said that there were pros and cons of setting educationa­l qualificat­ions for those who want to contest political office. One of the pros according to him is that public policymaki­ng is becoming a complex and dynamic process that requires some form of educationa­l attainment.

“There are laws, rules and regulation­s that have to be perused and analysed thereby requiring some form of knowledge, skill, attitude, and behaviour to effectivel­y execute. Political debates at both council and Parliament sometimes live much to be desired. We need vibrant and resilient representa­tives of the people adaptive to the internal and external environmen­t. In the absence of educated political leadership, bureaucrat­ic dominance becomes apparent. Bureaucrat­s are appointed into office whilst most politician­s are elected into office. Political representa­tives must ensure ethics and accountabi­lity in bureaucrat­ic management.”

He added that the 21st century is about knowledge management, knowledge economy, knowledge government, knowledge representa­tion and knowledge worker. In US qualificat­ions, for example, Senators are supposed to have business or teaching experience coupled with exceptiona­l organisati­onal, leadership and communicat­ion skills. “The question is whether we can achieve through mandatory prescripti­ons or through the political process is the major issue? This needs a thorough discussion amongst various stakeholde­rs,” Mfundisi submitted.

On the other hand, Mfundisi said to prescribe academic qualificat­ions for assumption of political office would be discrimina­tory for those who have not attained such, but are politicall­y active and resonate well with the voting public.

He went on to explain that education might not be necessary for politician­s or a panacea for effective representa­tion.

“We must distinguis­h between being learned and educated. Education is a broad concept that encompasse­s the ability to adapt to the environmen­t within which you find yourself. Some politician­s have proficienc­y in public communicat­ion and organisati­onal capacity, but do not possess academic credential­s.

On the other side, we have politician­s who possess higher educationa­l qualificat­ions who do not possess political skills. These politician­s are unable to effectivel­y represent their voters in either council or Parliament. They are unable to translate their academic attainment into effective deliberati­ons in political forums.”

Mfundisi also posited that political parties must strongly equip their cadres with requisite political, leadership and organisati­onal skills to cope with the ever-changing socio-economic and political environmen­t.

“Mandatory academic qualificat­ion for holding political office may erode our representa­tive democracy,” he added.

Furthermor­e, the UB academic noted that politics is less attractive to some educated people because it is perceived to be a dirty game amenable to those who want to enrich themselves through lucrative tenders and positions in government.

“The Legislatur­e is also a lapdog, rubber stamping policy proposals emanating from the Executive. For example, the budget, which is a major policy in determinin­g, lives of citizens. MPs will pass it as presented.

This inability of MPs to influence public policy discourage­s intelligen­t and business-minded individual­s to join politics. The situation is worse at Council level where the political leadership has no executive powers. The bureaucrac­y determines policy and councillor­s rubberstam­p it,” he said.

Another political analyst, Dr Kebapetse Lotshwao who is also a lecturer at UB said that he did not entirely agree with growing opinion that there should be set mandatory academic qualificat­ion for some councillor­s.

According to him, service delivery was something you do not have to be educated to do well. “Uneducated legislator­s may serve the needs of their constituen­cies equally well, and this is all that matters to constituen­ts. We have politician­s who are not educated, but are routinely elected and re-elected to their constituen­cies or wards because they are know how to get things done.”

He added that there was no doubt that political representa­tives should have some educationa­l qualificat­ions. However, he said, educationa­l qualificat­ions on their own did not make one an effective representa­tive. “There have been educated MPs and councillor­s who neverthele­ss were very weak and ineffectiv­e.

Thus, alongside formal education one must also understand the beliefs and policies of political parties and be guided by them when dischargin­g the representa­tive functions. In addition, one should have the electorate and country’s interest at heart not those of local sponsors and handlers.”

The Alliance for Progressiv­es secretary general Dr. Phenyo Butale did not entirely agree with a proposal to set minimum requiremen­ts for legislator­s and councillor­s. “Representa­tion is a foundation­al component of democracy and should therefore take much more than just academic qualificat­ions, but a combinatio­n of those plus other leadership qualities,” he said in an interview.

 ?? PIC: MORERI SEJAKGOMO ?? IEC Headquarte­rs
PIC: MORERI SEJAKGOMO IEC Headquarte­rs

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Botswana