Trump’s tainted presidency
THE more we learn about Russia’s hacking and the release of its electronic loot during our presidential election, the more it becomes clear that Donald Trump’s victory and his imminent presidency are already tainted beyond redemption.
While Russian hacks “were not involved in vote tallying”, the publishing of pilfered emails and promulgation of fake news altered the zeitgeist, poisoned the political environment and shifted public opinion, all of which redounded to Trump’s benefit.
Trump is as much Russia’s appointment as our elected executive. The legacy of his political ascendance will be written in Cyrillic and affixed with an asterisk.
Do not let this be buried in the pundits’ blathering: A hostile foreign power stole confidential correspondence from US citizens – this is no different from physically breaking into a US office and carting off boxes of written letters – and funnelled that stolen material to a willing conspirator, Julian Assange. The foreign power then had its desired result achieved on our Election Day.
This was an act of war and our presidency was the spoil.
This is not to say that some of what was revealed about the Democrats in the hacked emails wasn’t disturbing. It was, although most of the emails simply showed the unappetising process by which the sausage is made. What made the leaks feel fishy was the asymmetry of the targeting – it was Democratic only.
Putin helped to defeat a woman, Hillary Clinton, who promised to be a staunch adversary and helped elevate in her stead a Troglodytic lout who somehow believes that the snake that coils itself around you is just giving you a hug, and who sounded so pro- Vladimir Putin that he did everything but blow kisses at the Kremlin.
On Friday, intelligence officials released a damning report on the Russian hacking that read: “We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
The same day, Trump told my colleague Michael Shear that the focus on the hacking amounted to “a political witch hunt”. Wrong again. It’s a truth hunt. Furthermore, the only person subjected to a witch hunt was named Clinton.
Yes, as you repeatedly exclaimed before the votes were cast, the election was rigged, not by widespread voter fraud, as you falsely suggested, but rather by widespread dissemination of fraudulently obtained information. It is no coincidence that WikiLeaks began to release John Podesta’s emails just an hour after Trump’s disgusting “grab them by the [expletive]” Access Hollywood tape surfaced.
Mr Trump, your victory is tainted; your legitimacy is rightly in question. The American people cast their ballots in the fog of fake news and under influence of stolen property weaponised as a tool of propaganda.
Some may hesitate to say that the US presidency was stolen, but it is irrefutable that the integrity of our democratic process was injured when the sanctity of what we considered uncorrupted self-determination was assaulted.
Donald Trump is Vladimir Putin’s American “president” – clearly his preference and possibly his product.