The Phnom Penh Post

Reductress goes beyond the internet

- Bonnie Wertheim

STUMBLING unaware into a standup show is a mistake New York City tourists make daily. But at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theater on the second Thursday of January, audience members did not seem confused as to why they were sipping beer in a dark cellar, awaiting the first act of the monthly comedy night staged by Reductress, the soon-to-be four-year-old satirical online magazine. The self-selecting crowd appeared, like the site’s readership, to be made up of liberal-minded women.

“That does mean we have to castrate all men before they leave the basement,” Nicole Silverberg, the website’s associate editor, said before introducin­g the performers, who included writers from Broad City, Late Night With Seth Meyers and The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon.

The crowd could take a joke. But online, some people still don’t get Reductress, which Sarah Pappalardo and Beth Newell started as a blog in April 2013 and which now receives more than 1 million unique views a month. In a segment she calls “Meet the Commenters”, Silverberg highlights the unconversa­nt readers who troll the site’s social channels, asking where they can find the (nonexisten­t) print edition, questionin­g the objectivit­y of its “reporting” and more.

“We have certain articles that sort of eclipse our normal readership, and that’s when we’ll start to get a flooding in of people who a) don’t under- stand what it is that we do and are not aware that it’s satire, or b) are very hateful of whatever idea we’re trying to communi- cate,” Silverberg, 26, said after the show, which she hosts.

That the site registers as sincere to some readers could be seen as a mark of its skill, akin to Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, retweeting The Onion. Reductress’ editors excel at parodying lifestyle articles (beauty tips, first-person experience­s, personalit­y quizzes – anything you might find in the pages of Cosmopolit­an or on Bustle). At the same time, mistaking humour for journalism may be a sign of the times, as fake news continues to thrive online.

But for all the readers who don’t get Reductress, there are many who want more of it. And so in the past year, the editors have expanded their offerings, with “Haha, Wow!” at the Chelsea theatre and a bicoastal comedy tour; a podcast called Mouth Time, which Silverberg and Anna Drezen, an editor at large, will record live March 23 with Phoebe Robinson of 2 Dope Queens; a fresh line of merchandis­e; and the mock self-help book How to Win at Feminism. The staff remains small: Three editors and two part-time contributo­rs share an office.

“We rotate panhandlin­g outside the co-working space,” Pappalardo said, joking. “It’s way more profitable than display ads.”

The website’s founders met at New York’s Magnet Theater, where they worked on sketch shows together.

“Most of the sketches Sarah and I were writing at the time were not women-focused, because we were mostly working on projects with a lot of dudes in the room who didn’t really get those jokes,” Newell said.

But when they started hosting workshops for women, they found that certain types of jokes were suddenly resonating. Pappalardo, Newell and several comedian friends began writing satirical stories in the key of women’s magazines. Reductress.com went live after they had accumulate­d about 50 pieces.

“I think a lot of the comedy historical­ly that’s made fun of women’s media has come from a male perspectiv­e that’s like, women are dumb, that’s why they do this dumb media,” Newell said. “It’s not taken on the fact that women are smart, and they deserve better content.”

In How to Win at Feminism, Pappalardo, Newell and Drezen take aim at the commodific­ation of feminism, the beauty industrial complex, the limitation­s of “lean in” and empowermen­t, whatever it may mean.

“The idea of empowermen­t is a great thing,” Pappalardo said. “I find it odd that it’s never being marketed to men, only to women.”

The book, written during summer 2015, frequently name-checks Hillary Clinton, who was newly on the campaign trail. The authors were ardent supporters.

“The day after the election, Beth and I had to go to LA to promote our book that just launched,” Pappalardo said. “We were expecting to get on a plane celebratin­g the glory of our new female president, and instead we were dealt this blow.”

Back last summer, the editors of Reductress made a statement in solidarity with survivors of sexual assault when they covered their home page with assault-related stories. They hadn’t planned to make quite as big of a splash for the election, but they did have a lot of stories in place to mark Clinton’s becoming the 45th president of the US. They hadn’t considered Donald Trump’s victory possible and were, accordingl­y, unprepared for that outcome.

After the election, Reductress’ voice became louder. At the Upright Citizens Brigade show in January, Silverberg opened with an appeal to the audience to call their representa­tives expressing dissatisfa­ction with Trump’s Cabinet appointmen­ts, and every comic’s set began with a tone of exasperati­on or helplessne­ss.

The editors have since softened their focus on politics and returned to publishing the evergreen stories that had been the magazine’s signature.

“Good political satire is hard,” Pappalardo said. “We’re so busy with other stuff that we, in house, haven’t been able to devote time to doing it right. And we’d rather not do it at all than not do it right.”

 ?? MANDEL/THE NEW YORK TIMES LEVI ?? Sarah Pappalardo, left, and Beth Newell, founders of the online women’s humour magazine Reductress, in New York, January 9.
MANDEL/THE NEW YORK TIMES LEVI Sarah Pappalardo, left, and Beth Newell, founders of the online women’s humour magazine Reductress, in New York, January 9.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cambodia