The murder of an Indian journalist

THE murder on Tuesday of the Indian journalist Gauri Lankesh, a fearless critic of rising Hindu-nationalist militancy, has all the hallmarks of a hit job.

“The message and not to independent journalists but to all dissenters is loud and clear,” tweeted Sidharth Bhatia, founding editor of the Indian online news site The Wire. “We are watching you and one day we will get you.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has let a climate of mob rule flourish in India, with his right-wing Hindu supporters vilifying “secularists”. The venom that reactionary social media trolls direct at journalists is especially vicious, but not entirely new. At least 27 Indian journalists have been killed since 1992 “in direct retaliation for their work”, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Only one of the killers has been convicted.

The government of the state of Karnataka is investigating the killing of Lankesh, an editor and publisher of a Kannada-language weekly tabloid. Her family has given the police closed-circuit video of the murder scene, so that the killers may be brought to justice.

This has not happened so far in the murders of other outspoken critics of rightwing Hindu nationalists. Narendra Dabholkar, whose campaigns against superstitious practices angered many Hindu religious activists, was shot to death near his home in Pune in 2013. Two years ago, Malleshappa Madivalappa Kalburgi, a former vice chancellor of Kannada University who spent decades debunking peddlers of superstition, was fatally shot in his home in Dharwad.

Lankesh had voiced concern about the climate of menace against journalists who didn’t toe the Hindu-nationalist line. If Modi doesn’t condemn her murder forcefully and denounce the harassment and threats that critics of Hindu militancy face daily, more critics will live in fear of deadly reprisal and Indian democracy will see dark days.