UK’s Johnson slaps business lobby for customs call

FOREIGN Secretary Boris Johnson pushed back on Sunday at calls from Britain’s biggest business lobby group for the country to stay in the European customs union after Brexit.

The Confederation of British Industry has said remaining in the customs union after the UK leaves the EU would be a “practical, real-world answer” to its profound challenges.

Hitting back on Twitter, Johnson said it made “no sense” for the CBI to keep calling for Britain to be part of the customs bloc. He added Prime Minister Theresa May had been clear in her keynote speech in Florence, Italy, in September that Britain would be leaving both the EU single market and customs union.

He cited the part of May’s speech in which she said Britain could not stay in either grouping because the EU had made it clear the country could not be members and limit immigration from the EU.

The bloc’s freedom of movement rules were a major factor in Britain’s referendum decision in favour of leaving.

“Brexit means taking control of laws, borders, money and trade. I’m confident British business can profit from the new opportunities,” Johnson wrote. “Staying in the customs union means effectively staying in the EU: the EU is a customs union. It means no new free trade deals, no new export opportunities, and no leading role in the WTO [World Trade Organization].”

In a speech yesterday, CBI Director-General Carolyn Fairbairn was expected to set out why the group believes a postBrexit customs union is best for British business.

She will say time is running out and businesses urgently need decisions to protect British jobs and growth, according to extracts released Sunday.

The business lobby head is set to say there has been “too much ideology, too little urgency” – in both Brussels and London.

Fairbairn is expected to argue that the question of whether Britain is leaving the EU has been resolved and the goal now is to secure a good outcome.

She will say it requires a profound change of approach, with more reliance on facts and evidence than ideological positions.