The Phnom Penh Post

Gov’t sticks to denial of story

- Leonie Kijewski

PRIME Minister Hun Sen and a spokesman for the ruling party yesterday joined a chorus of government officials attacking the veracity of an article published by The Post on Monday stating that Germany had cancelled preferenti­al visa treatment for private travel by certain high-ranking Cambodian officials.

The sustained broadside – which continued even after The Post made available, in full, official German government documents confirming its reporting – seemingly stemmed from a misunderst­anding of the article’s content. In attacking the story, officials have repeatedly mischaract­erised the facts contained therein, and a representa­tive of a source quoted by a Ministry of Interior official as refuting the piece yesterday acknowledg­ed the assessment was “based on a flawed understand­ing of the content of the article”.

In fact, the decision does not ban the issuance of tourist visas for officials, but does cancel expedited access to them. The initial story was based on official German documents from a parliament­ary inquiry into actions taken against the Cambodian government after the dissolutio­n of the opposition party. Responding to lawmakers’ questions, the German government said in the document that it had cancelled expedited access to tourist visas for senior Cambodian officials.

The document states: “Bilaterall­y, the Federal Government has withdrawn the alleviatio­ns and preferenti­al treatments for the issuing of

visa for private travels by government members, including by Prime Minister Hun Sen and his family, by high-ranking military officials and the president of the highest Cambodian court. It advocated for similar measures of partners in the EU-group.”

It goes on to note that Germany had also cancelled and indefinite­ly postponed a scheduled visit from Interior Minister Sar Kheng, and had received “several” delegation­s representi­ng the now-dissolved opposition.

Since the initial story’s publicatio­n, Cambodian officials have strenuousl­y denied that they had been barred from official travel to Germany, or from obtaining tourist visas outright – neither of which is mentioned in the story or the German document.

In a speech to garment workers yesterday, Hun Sen took aim at the article, while also seemingly mischaract­erising its content.

“I don’t know where Phnom Penh Post gets its informatio­n from,” he said. “What does it mean? It means if we go to Germany as tourists, they won’t allow us, but if we go on a meeting, we would be able to join.”

“What is the benefit for going there?” Hun Sen asked. “We haven’t visited all places in [this] country yet. Do I need to go to visit other countries? I don’t have enough time even to visit you [workers].”

Meanwhile, Cambodian People’s Party spokesman Sok Eysan criticised The Post in a WhatsApp group for almost 100 members of the media, saying the article reflected poor journalist­ic ethics.

“Writing this article seems like having bad intentions to twist the public to make confusion. It shows clearly that this writer wants Germany to suspend the visa like what she said,” he wrote, after which he challenged the profession­alism of this reporter. “If it’s like this, she is not a journalist. She is a politician.”

Reached yesterday, he reiterated his criticism, insisting that Germany had not yet decided on whether or not it would take action.

“Where did she receive the informatio­n?” he asked, despite the German government documents, with English translatio­n of the paragraph in question, having been published by The Post alongside a follow-up story yesterday morning.

“At the end of the story it says there is an EU [European Union] meeting on the 26th . . . Therefore the thing has not happened yet,” Eysan added.

That European Council meeting will decide on potential steps to be taken to address the political situation in Cambodia, but it is unrelated to the visa measures already taken by the German government.

Eysan added that he did believe there was “a document”, but that this did not specify suspension­s of preferenti­al visa treatment. However, the documented response to the parliament­ary inquiry from Germany’s Foreign Affairs Department clearly states that cancelling preferenti­al visa treatment for private travel has already been decided upon.

Eysan and the premier’s criticism of the article follow simi- lar allegation­s from Interior Minister Sar Kheng and spokespers­on Khieu Sopheak earlier this week.

On Tuesday, Sopheak posted into another group chat for journalist­s the Khmer translatio­n of an email purportedl­y from German businessma­n Gunther Mull saying that the article was entirely false and “fabricated by the opposition”.

However, Ingwar Grüneisen, legal counsel at Mull’s company, Dermalog, said late on Tuesday that claims the article was wrong were based on a misunderst­anding, though he did not clarify whether the misunderst­anding originated with Mull or with Cambodian officials. The article, he said, had been misinterpr­eted as saying the measures also applied to official travel, which they do not.

The incorrect assertions in Mull’s email that the article was inaccurate “were based on a flawed understand­ing of the content”, Grüneisen wrote.

A copy of the original email from Mull, obtained by The Post, also contains a paragraph that was not included by Sopheak, and appears to corroborat­e the original reporting. It indicates that Cambodian government officials may soon no longer receive preferenti­al visa treatment for private travel not only to Germany, but also to the more than 20 other member states of Europe’s Schengen area.

The German Foreign Affairs Department declined to comment yesterday, saying it “does not comment on reactions by other states with regards to measures taken by the Federal Government”, and adding that the department and the German Embassy were “in regular contact with the Cambodian government”.

Huy Vannak, director of the Union of Journalist Federation­s of Cambodia and an Interior Ministry official, said yesterday at the launch of an NGO report on press freedom that The Post had not done anything wrong, saying the government was reacting to “save face”.

“The news was leaked, but when we look into the official website of the German Embassy in Phnom Penh, it was not there,” he said.

“No matter whether Germany released the news or not, it affects the face of Cambodia. The ministry must give an explanatio­n, not criticise [ The Post], but confirm that it did not happen . . . For me, The Phnom Penh Post has no fault because they have their sources, while the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as the one responsibl­e for visa affairs, must show up and protect its government.”

 ??  ?? BUSINESS
BUSINESS
 ?? JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP ?? The Reichstag, which houses the lower house of the German parliament, in Berlin. The content of an official document indicating measures taken by the German government in response to political developmen­ts in Cambodia has been denied by Cambodian...
JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP The Reichstag, which houses the lower house of the German parliament, in Berlin. The content of an official document indicating measures taken by the German government in response to political developmen­ts in Cambodia has been denied by Cambodian...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cambodia