Prosecutors seek 30 years’ jail for ousted SK president
SOUTH Korean prosecutors yesterday demanded a 30-year-jail sentence for former President Park Geun-hye, sacked over a wide-ranging corruption scandal which exposed shady links between big business and politics and prompted massive street protests.
The 66-year-old daughter of a former dictator was dismissed in March and has been in custody for almost a year.
“We ask the court to hand down 30 years in prison and [a fine of ] 118.5 billion won [$110 million] for the accused, who must take ultimate responsibility for the scandal as the 18th president of this country,” prosecutors.
They said Park, in collusion with her secret confidante and long-time friend Choi Soon-sil, took or was promised bribes totalling 59.2 billion won ($52 million) from three South Korean companies, Samsung, Lotte and SK, in return for policy favours.
Park has also been charged with coercing 18 large firms to “donate” a total of 77.4 billion won to two dubious foundations controlled by Choi.
The Seoul Central District Court earlier this month found Choi guilty of abuse of power, bribery and interfering in government business and sentenced her to 20 years in prison. The verdict and sentence was seen as a potential pointer to the decision in Park’s separate trial in the same court, because 15 of the 18 charges Choi faced mirror charges against the ex-president. The verdict on Park is expected on April 6.
“The accused [Park] abused her power delegated by the people for private gain for Choi and herself . . . violated core constitutional values on the protection of the market economy and free democracy,” the statement said. “Consequently, the accused became the first presidenttobesackedthroughimpeachment, leaving an indelible scar on the country’s constitutional history.”
The prosecutors also rebuked Park for “allying with the chaebol instead of the people”, in reference to the country’s family-controlled large conglomerates, accusing her of strengthening “unhealthy ties between political power and economic power”.
When allegations about Choi’s misdeeds started surfacing in news media, Park tried to mislead public opinion and denounced the reports as “political offensives”, prosecutors said. “When the court issued an arrest warrant for the accused Park, she tried to cover up the true picture of the case by describing the move as political revenge.”
Some legal experts believe she is in an even worse position than Choi was, noting that the judge who sentenced Choi had denounced Park for having “delegated” presidential authority to a private individual.
Park’s lawyers denied all the charges, asserting there was “no solid evidence” to back them up.