Egypt asks Interpol to trace Tutankhamun artefact sold for $6M
EGYPT has asked internationa l police agency Interpol to track down a 3,000-yearold Tutankhamun artefact that was sold in London for $ 6 million despite fierce opposition from Cairo, government officia ls said.
Christie’s auction house sold the 28.5cm relic for £4,746,250 ($5,970,000) to an unknown buyer in early July at one of its most controversial auctions in years.
But less than a week after t he sa le, Eg y pt’s National Committee for Antiquities Repatriation (NCAR) said after an urgent meeting that nationa l prosecutors had asked Interpol “to issue a circular to trace” such artefacts over a lleged missing paper work.
“The committee expresses its deep discontent of the unprofessional behaviour of the sale of Egyptian antiquities without providing the ownership documents and the evidences that prove its legal export from Egypt,” the NCAR said in a statement.
The committee – headed by Minister of Antiquities Khaled el-Enany and attended by his predecessor Zahi Hawass as well as officials from various ministries – also called upon Britain to “prohibit the export of the sold artefacts” until the Egyptian authorities were shown the documents.
It suggested the issue could have an impact on cultural relations, by referencing “the ongoing cooperation between both countries in the field of archaeology, especially that there are 18 British archaeological missions working in Egypt”.
The NCAR added it had hired a British law firm to file a “civil lawsuit” although no further details were given.
‘Stolen from Karnak’
The London sale of the head of “Boy King” Tutankhamun angered Egyptian officials at the time and sparked a protest outside Christie’s by about a dozen people who held up signs reading “stop trading in smuggled antiquities”.
Hawass said the piece appeared to have been “stolen” in the 1970s from the Karnak Temple complex just north of Luxor and the Eg y ptian foreign ministr y asked t he UK Foreign Office and t he UN cultural body Unesco to step in and halt t he sa le.
But such interventions are rare and made only when there is clear evidence of the item’s legitimate acquisition by the seller being in dispute.
Christie’s argued t hat Eg y pt had never before expressed the same level of concern about an item whose ex istence has been “well known and ex hibited publicly” for many years.
“The object is not, and has not been, t he subject of an investigation,” Christie’s said in a statement.
The auction house has published a chronolog y of how the relic changed hands between European art dealers over t he past 50 years and said that it would “not sell any work where there isn’t clear title of ownership”.