4WDrive

LIFTED to Perfection

An Elka Suspension mod made the grade for this Toyota 4Runner

- WORDS AND PHOTOS BY PETER BOYER

Like its predecesso­rs, the 5th Gen Toyota 4Runner TRD is a formidable offroad vehicle just in stock trim, right from the dealer’s lot. So why is the suspension commonly one of the first mods among many off-roaders?

Manufactur­ers design and build vehicles that appeal to a global customer base, and the OEM suspension on new 4Runners is a compromise for the masses, yet it may not perfectly fulfill the specific needs for all 4Runner owners. Fortunatel­y, a vast aftermarke­t exists for Toyota 4X4 vehicles, which include several options for modifying 4Runners. But therein lays the conundrum – with so many options, which one will look and work the best for specific needs and applicatio­ns?

To determine the answer, I purposeful­ly left out the lowest cost option – spacers. A spacer degrades the performanc­e of the stock suspension in order to achieve one purpose – to raise the vehicle by inserting what amounts to a fat shim at one end of the spring to raise the suspension by the thickness of the spacer.

Inexpensiv­e, sure, but since I was interested in improving other characteri­stics of my 4Runner suspension, as well as achieving a mild lift, I avoided any levelling or lift kits based solely on spacers. I’m not against spacers (as you will see later), as they have an important function, but on their own they are not a premium method of lifting a vehicle. So, what are my needs? To clarify them, I grouped them into three categories:

Aesthetics

Toyota 4X4s look best with some amount of higher ground clearance. This is perhaps reflected from their heritage in the first models and the modern 4Runners are no exception. As 4Runners became larger and less truck-like, they seemed to evolve with a lower profile with each generation. The current 5th Gen 4Runner may have the most off-road capabiliti­es yet from Toyota, except for the top of the line TRD Pro. The proportion­s were greatly improved with some extra, even modest, height. By comparison, the Pro adds 1” of lift to its aftermarke­t-style front suspension and retains the stock rear springs, thus gaining an almost level, robust stance. This is similar to the type of modest profile I wanted for my rig.

Performanc­e

Stock (non-TRD Pro) 4Runners come with a distinct forward rake – the rear on mine was 2” higher than the front. This characteri­stic, along with a relatively soft suspension, forced the vehicle to occasional­ly “nose dive” during sudden braking. This was something I wanted to correct. Since I like to wheel alone and wanted additional peace of mind, I added an aluminum front bumper and a Warn Evo VR 10s winch for a total weight gain of 46 kg (102 lbs) on the front end. I also increased weight of the SUV with a steel rear bumper featuring recovery points, and a steel cargo rack. As you add accessorie­s, weight accumulate­s, until you need to increase the load carrying capacity of

the suspension to retain stability, and ground clearance.

One of the biggest reasons to lift a vehicle is to accommodat­e a larger wheel size, which also increases ground clearance. 4Runners look great with 33” tires, however, I elected to retain the stock tire size to maintain stock gearing, fuel economy, and avoid body modificati­ons that are necessary on 5th Gens to prevent tire rubbing issues.

My 4Runner came with an optional high tech stabilizer system called Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS), and as I looked at the suspension packages available, I wanted to have one specifical­ly designed with the KDSS system in mind, if at all possible.

Quality

I bought my 4Runner new and I wanted to make sure that whatever I did to it was an improvemen­t over OEM. A 4Runner represents tremendous high-speed drivabilit­y and off road capability and I didn’t want to lose that. Also, as I live outside the Greater Toronto Area in a snow belt, the components needed to be tough enough to withstand the common winter slurry of salt and sand. I wanted a suspension system that was made from high quality materials, was well engineered, while representi­ng good value that could stand up to Canadian driving conditions.

After researchin­g the major manufactur­ers, I came across Elka – a Canadian manufactur­er of premium suspension­s mostly known for its racing prowess and custom suspension­s for ATVs, snow machines and Spyder motorcycle­s. Elka has broadened its market presence with select truck suspension­s, including 4Runners and Tacomas.

Their most popular aftermarke­t suspension kit is for the Tacoma. After speaking with Elka’s technical representa­tives, I easily concluded this was exactly what I was looking for. I ordered their 2.5 IFP coilover for the KDSS, set at the factory default of 1 ½” with matching rear shocks. Using the TRD Pro as my reference point, I wanted to be sure that the extra ½” that I was gaining over the TRD Pro wouldn’t result in a front-high stance. I considered a longer rear spring, however the various aftermarke­t rear spring options available to me offered at least 1” of lift and significan­t rate increases, which I was afraid would result in a high rear, ungainly look for the modest lift I was trying to achieve.

As a result, I opted for a ½” spacer that was installed on the conical bump stop in the centre of the rear spring. I used a Cornfed spacer, which fits almost invisibly at the top of the rear spring. I think the results are perfect, with an almost impercepti­ble positive rake.

I topped off the suspension modificati­ons with a JBA upper control arm, just to be well within specificat­ion for proper wheel alignment, and to ensure good clearance with those big front shocks at full droop.

This suspension is a premium solution that performs spectacula­rly and is extremely beefy, strong and comfortabl­e. It provides just the modest amount of lift I wanted and I think it’s slightly better than a TRD Pro, and well within the specificat­ions for the KDSS stabilizer system.

The Elka uses a 700 lb/inch spring on the front coilover and when combined with the compressio­n and rebound characteri­stics that their engineers programmed into the 2.5 IFP shocks, the ride is smooth and predictabl­e. The extra weight my 4Runner carries is unnoticeab­le and the nose diving when braking is eliminated. It’s extremely stable at high speeds for travelling on highways to the trail and the ride height looks great. It was a little expensive, but well worth it in the end. Overall, it was a huge improvemen­t to my 4Runner.

 ??  ?? The increased spring rate carries the extra weight of a winch and aftermarke­t bumper without any difficulty.
The increased spring rate carries the extra weight of a winch and aftermarke­t bumper without any difficulty.
 ??  ?? The beefy shock stem of the 2.5 Elka IFP does not use a welded eyelet where it mounts directly to the lower control arm. The spring pre-load adjustment ring is a one piece design.
The beefy shock stem of the 2.5 Elka IFP does not use a welded eyelet where it mounts directly to the lower control arm. The spring pre-load adjustment ring is a one piece design.
 ??  ?? The rear shocks seem massive compared to OEM.
The rear shocks seem massive compared to OEM.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada