Calgary Herald

Tories delay measures to mark firearms

Regulation­s intended to help trace crime guns

- JIM BRONSKILL

The federal government is delaying implementa­tion of regulation­s intended to help police trace crime guns — the seventh time it has put off the measures.

Just days before the federal election call, the government quietly published a notice deferring the firearm- marking regulation­s until June 1, 2017.

The measures would require specific, identifiab­le markings be stamped on firearms. They had been slated to take effect Dec. 1 of this year.

The July 29 notice from Public Safety Canada says the delay will allow the government to continue consultati­ons “with a broad range of stakeholde­rs” — despite six previous delays in enacting the regulation­s, first drafted in 2004.

Public Safety spokeswoma­n Zarah Malik did not make anyone available for an interview about the latest delay.

The regulation­s would require domestical­ly manufactur­ed firearms to bear the name of the manufactur­er, serial number and “Canada” or “CA.” Imported guns would have to carry the “Canada” or “CA” designatio­n along with the last two digits of the year of import.

The measures would help Canada meet the requiremen­ts of the United Nations Firearms Protocol and a convention of the Organizati­on of American States.

There is support among police for the marking scheme to expedite investigat­ions into gun crimes and detect firearms traffickin­g, smuggling and stockpilin­g, the Public Safety Canada notice says. The import markings can also help law enforcemen­t determine whether to focus on a smuggling operation.

Some firearms advocates have argued the obligation to mark imported guns would mean acquiring marking technology or making arrangemen­ts for another company to apply markings, with an estimated cost of $ 200 per gun, the notice says.

However, an independen­t study commission­ed by the government said the cost to stamp or engrave markings for Canadian manufactur­ers and large importers would range from nothing at all to $ 25 per firearm.

It was not possible to gauge the impact on individual­s and small importers.

During the latest deferral period, the Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee — appointed by the public safety minister to provide advice — expressed support for “having fewer marking requiremen­ts” in the planned regulation­s.

The Coalition for Gun Control says marking is an essential tool for enforcemen­t, helping states in their efforts to trace weapon flows and preventing the diversion of legal guns to the illegal market.

“Given the problems with smuggled guns internatio­nally and on the streets of Canadian cities it is, of course, disappoint­ing that the Canadian government has once again delayed implementi­ng this critical set of measures,” said coalition president Wendy Cukier.

 ?? JEFF
MCINTOSH/ THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Firearm- marking regulation­s, first drafted in 2004, would help Canada meet UN requiremen­ts.
JEFF MCINTOSH/ THE CANADIAN PRESS Firearm- marking regulation­s, first drafted in 2004, would help Canada meet UN requiremen­ts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada