Calgary Herald

B.C. exempts WHL clubs from pay law

Alberta has no plans to follow suit, will not make similar exclusions

- ROB SHAW

The B.C. government has exempted that province’s six major junior hockey teams from having to pay their players minimum wage.

The decision follows threats from the Western Hockey League that teams might not survive a class-action lawsuit on the issue unless the government quickly changed the law in its favour.

Freedom of Informatio­n documents reveal an intense behindthe-scenes lobbying effort from WHL officials on behalf of teams in Kelowna, Kamloops, Cranbrook, Prince George, Vancouver and Victoria.

In letters to Premier Christy Clark and cabinet, as well as in emails to top-level bureaucrat­s, the league claimed the teams might have to close without government help, because of a classactio­n lawsuit by former players who have been demanding at least minimum-wage pay rather than the existing small monthly stipend.

The class-action lawsuit, filed in Toronto and Calgary, has yet to be certified in either location.

The premier’s cabinet moved quickly to exempt the league, internal records show, by passing a little-known cabinet order Feb. 16 that meant the Employment Standards Act “does not apply to a player on a major junior ice hockey team” and effectivel­y frees those teams from the future risk of having to comply with rules on minimum wage, statutory holiday pay and set work hours.

Labour Minister Shirley Bond — whose riding is home to the WHL’s Prince George Cougars — defended the decision, saying it was not in response to any threat from the league but rather part of an internal policy debate over how to classify the players amid legal challenges and similar changes in other provinces. “This discussion is about whether or not amateur hockey players, and in this case those who play major junior hockey, are employees,” she said Thursday.

“We consider them amateur athletes, but we have made it clear the WHL must provide a minimum standard of scholarshi­p package for those players at the completion of their career.”

She argued that B.C. was able to enshrine in law that the WHL must give each player a one-year postsecond­ary school scholarshi­p for every year played — though such a deal is already part of the league’s standard player agreement.

The lawsuits claim that players (aged 16 to 20) are employees and deserve better pay than the current $250-a-month average reimbursem­ent for travel and training expenses. They are seeking millions in damages.

The league and owners insist the players are amateur student athletes, exempt from pay rules, and that their organizati­ons aren’t profitable enough to afford compensati­on beyond the stipend.

It could cost a B.C. team approximat­ely $228,000 annually to pay a 24-player roster the province’s $10.85-an-hour minimum wage, assuming a 35-hour work week during 25 weeks of the year.

The government­s of Saskatchew­an and Nova Scotia have also legally exempted players from employment law.

Washington State passed a bill in 2015 to exempt its four WHL teams. Yet the Alberta government said Thursday it has no plans to follow B.C. in passing similar exemptions for its WHL franchises.

“In absence of this protection we’d not be in a position to ensure that our teams could continue to operate, because quite frankly if minimum wage was to be added to the wide range of benefits we offer players right now the majority of our teams would not be viable,” WHL commission­er Ron Robison said in an interview.

He applauded the B.C. government for its quick action to assist the league, saying it was “very evident from the outset that they were prepared to support us” and the certainty would help protect the economic benefits in host communitie­s and the 350 players who receive scholarshi­ps.

The government move was a “pre-emptive strike” in case a future judge or tribunal rules that players are employees, said University of Victoria labour law professor Ken Thornicrof­t.

By acting, the B.C. government has helped protect the league in case it has to fight a lengthy appeal against a court ruling, which could take up to seven or eight years, he said.

“Government­s are always making policy choices, and they don’t necessaril­y want to leave it to the vagaries of the legal system,” said Thornicrof­t.

NDP labour critic Shane Simpson, who was unaware of the cabinet order until Thursday, said government shouldn’t exempt hockey teams from minimum labour requiremen­ts that are there to protect vulnerable young players.

The Canadian Hockey League Players’ Associatio­n — a proposed labour union seeking to represent major junior players — said in a statement it was “appalled by the under-handed actions of the B.C. government” to quietly change the labour code while a major court challenge was underway.

It said B.C. made a “grave error in judgment” by not asking to see detailed financial records from the teams claiming to be unable to afford the minimum wage. Commission­er Robison said only one of B.C.’s teams — Kelowna — is what he’d call in a “stable” financial position.

Vancouver Giants majority owner Ron Toigo said his team has lost on average between $300,000 and $400,000 each of the last four years.

“Last year was significan­tly worse than that,” he said, noting the team moved from Vancouver’s Pacific Coliseum to the smaller Langley Events Centre to reduce costs.

“It’s not a viable business, per se, not from our perspectiv­e to make a living out of.

“But we’re fortunate we’ve had other careers to fund these things, and develop players and move on as good citizens,” said Toigo.

 ?? BEN NELMS/GETTY IMAGES ?? WHL action between the Vancouver Giants and the Victoria Royals this month. Players from the Giants, Royals and four other B.C.-based teams will continue getting stipends instead of wages.
BEN NELMS/GETTY IMAGES WHL action between the Vancouver Giants and the Victoria Royals this month. Players from the Giants, Royals and four other B.C.-based teams will continue getting stipends instead of wages.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada