Calgary Herald

EARNINGS ARE A REASON FOR OPTIMISM

Oilpatch companies are showing confidence in future

- DEBORAH YEDLIN Deborah Yedlin is a Calgary Herald columnist dyedlin@postmedia.com

It might sound cliche, but when it comes to the 2016 oilpatch earnings parade, what a difference a year makes. Especially if you happen to be Encana.

The natural gas weighted producer on Thursday reported decent results for 2016; its fourth-quarter numbers offering reason for optimism. That’s not what the market expected this time last year when its stock — then trading at $5.33 — had been downgraded to underperfo­rming.

Analyst reports then were unforgivin­g, saying the company needed more cost reductions, higher commodity prices or a significan­t asset sale to position it for long-term sustainabi­lity. There was even speculatio­n it could become a takeover target.

On Thursday, Encana’s shares closed at $16.29. Its full-year numbers showed a loss of US$928 million, or $1.07 a share, compared with a loss of US$5.2 billion or $6.28 a share in 2015.

The 2016 results included a ceiling test writedown of US$938 million, which reflects the economic value of the assets in this pricing environmen­t. When prices recover, the asset value can be appropriat­ely changed.

The story with Encana, as with many energy sector companies, is one of cost cutting. Whether it’s through well optimizati­on, more effective drilling and completion techniques or finding ways to trim excess costs, Encana is well positioned to benefit from higher commodity prices.

But, cost-cutting — like being on a diet — needs to be sustainabl­e, and the challenge heading into a stronger market is whether the lower cost structure can be maintained as companies start hiring and competing for labour.

There have been other times when costs have run away and companies vowed it wouldn’t happen again when conditions improved. Encana chief executive Doug Suttles said Thursday that the cost cutting was sustainabl­e, but the real answer to that won’t be evident until this time next year.

One take-away from Encana’s results is its continued allocation of capital spending south of the border. Much like 2016, most of the estimated $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion to be spent this year is earmarked to its assets in the Permian and Eagle Ford basins. It’s not alone. Imperial Oil has also pulled back on spending in Canada — its lowest amount in a decade — in what should be seen, on both counts, as a lack of confidence in the regulatory and fiscal regimes in Alberta.

When new projects that mirror existing operations take longer to approve than the initial one, it’s no surprise companies choose to spend their capital in jurisdicti­ons where it can start earning a more timely return.

In Imperial’s case, this means, in part, sitting on the sidelines until there is more clarity on the province’s 100 megatonne emissions cap, which has the potential to affect future oilsands investment­s.

Looming tax changes in the United States, in addition to the easing of exploratio­n and developmen­t restrictio­ns, means Canada will have to work harder, particular­ly with companies that can look elsewhere — to make the case for investing in the oilpatch.

It shouldn’t be lost on anyone that both Enbridge and TransCanad­a, which also reported 2016 earnings Thursday, have turned south of the border for growth opportunit­ies.

As was pointed out on TransCanad­a’s conference call, it has faced significan­t challenges to get so-called greenfield, or new, pipelines built, not just in Canada but also the U.S. northeast. For customers wanting certainty of supply, companies with robust networks such as TransCanad­a or Enbridge stand to benefit.

One comment on TransCanad­a’s earnings call referenced opportunit­ies that exist to leverage its mainline to the benefit of customers in the U.S. northeast.

Like Encana, the outlook for TransCanad­a, with the revival of the Keystone XL project and its purchase of Columbia Pipelines last April, is markedly different than a year ago, even as questions surround its unused capacity into Eastern Canada.

For 2016, TransCanad­a reported adjusted earnings of $2.1 billion, compared with $1.8 billion in 2015. The 2016 results included a number of writedowns, including a $176-million after-tax hit resulting from its decision last May to terminate its power purchase arrangemen­ts.

That contrasts with last year’s fourth-quarter earnings call when the company took a $2.9 billion writedown on its KXL investment and its stock was trading at $48.24. Those shares closed Thursday at $62.22.

Compared with where things stood a year ago — stock markets swooning amid global economic uncertaint­y, oil prices trading just under US$30 and natural gas in both Canada and the U.S. below $2 per thousand cubic feet — this earnings season carries a measure of optimism.

Both Encana and TransCanad­a tapped the equity markets in 2016, which was entirely impossible in 2015. Encana raised US$1.25 billion and TransCanad­a almost $8 billion Cdn. in two separate transactio­ns.

In as much as 2016 results will reflect the challenges that persisted through the year, oilpatch companies are also showing confidence in the future, with increased capital expenditur­es the leading indicator.

Green shoots anyone?

 ?? MIKE RIDEWOOD/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Encana CEO Doug Suttles said Thursday the firm’s cost cutting was sustainabl­e. The natural gas weighted producer reported decent results for 2016, writes Deborah Yedlin.
MIKE RIDEWOOD/THE CANADIAN PRESS Encana CEO Doug Suttles said Thursday the firm’s cost cutting was sustainabl­e. The natural gas weighted producer reported decent results for 2016, writes Deborah Yedlin.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada