Calgary Herald

Trump’s plan to sell off oil stockpile sparks debate

- MATTHEW DALY

President Donald Trump’s proposal to sell nearly half the U.S. emergency oil stockpile is sparking renewed debate about whether the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is still needed amid an ongoing oil production boom that has seen U.S. imports drop sharply in the past decade.

Trump’s budget, unveiled on Tuesday, calls for selling an additional 270 million barrels of oil over the next decade, raising an estimated US$16.6 billion. The proposal, on top of planned auctions expected over the next few years, could push the reserve below 300 million barrels by 2025. It now is at 688 million barrels.

The petroleum reserve, created in the wake of the 1970s Arab oil embargo, stores oil at four undergroun­d sites in Texas and Louisiana. The reserve guards against disruption­s in the flow of oil from the Middle East and other countries, and lawmakers from both parties have long warned against using it to raise money.

But some Republican­s say North Dakota’s oil-rich Bakken region offers a de facto reserve that can be tapped if needed.

“You know the world’s changed a lot in the last decade,” said Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., a senior member of the House energy committee. “We’re one of the largest oil producers in the world.”

Asked if he was worried that Trump’s proposal could deplete the reserve, Shimkus laughed. “Not when you have North Dakota and the Dakota (Access) Pipeline,” he said. Not all Republican­s agree. The petroleum reserve “is not an ATM for new spending,” Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski said in 2015 as the Obama administra­tion proposed selling off a smaller of portion of the reserve to help fund a budget agreement.

Murkowski, who chairs the Senate energy committee, was reviewing Trump’s proposal but “is generally opposed to selling off emergency oil reserves, particular­ly as pay-fors for unrelated measures” a spokeswoma­n said.

Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington state, the senior Democrat on the energy panel, vowed to defeat Trump’s plan.

“We are not going to let Donald Trump auction off our energy security to the highest bidder,” she said.

“The SPR exists to keep energy available and affordable in times of crisis or natural disaster, which helps low-income communitie­s most,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee.

Selling the reserve “to pay for tax cuts for the extremely rich is especially cruel,” Grijalva said, calling the plan a “short-sighted favour to oil billionair­es.”

Budget director Mick Mulvaney said the proposed sale would not cause a security risk, citing increased oil production from fracking and other drilling techniques that have opened up areas once out of reach.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada