Calgary Herald

Public lands planning must respect science

Some recreation uses just too destructiv­e, write Lorne Fitch and Kevin Van Tighem

- Lorne Fitch is a profession­al biologist, a retired fish and wildlife biologist and an adjunct professor at the University of Calgary. Kevin Van Tighem is a landscape ecologist and author.

The best planning anticipate­s and prepares for future excellence. The worst simply perpetuate­s past failures. Recreation planning currently underway for the public lands of Alberta’s Oldman drainage and Porcupine Hills appears aimed at the muddy middle. We can do better.

Past government failures have filled our headwaters with uncontroll­ed off-highway vehicle (OHV) use, summer-long squatters’ camps, gunfire, motorcycle racing, weeds, muddy streams and too many fish and wildlife species now classified as threatened.

Those failures drove many Albertans to turn their backs on the forest reserves as a recreation­al destinatio­n because of the perception and reality of danger and disenfranc­hisement. In effect, Albertans were displaced from their own best places.

When Alberta Environmen­t and Parks Minister Shannon Phillips directed staff to work with stakeholde­rs to develop science-based land-use plans she offered us the chance to get them back.

A first principle of such planning should be that our public lands should no longer be compromise­d by efforts to cram every imaginable economic, social, cultural and recreation­al pursuit into them. These are finite landscapes with intrinsic and important values, not the least of which is that they supply clean water to two out of three Albertans.

Good plans start with science. The government got off to a good start with a linear footprint management plan for the Porcupine Hills and Oldman headwaters. The plan sets sciencebas­ed thresholds for road and trail density at which water quality and many fish and wildlife species start to suffer.

Unfortunat­ely, road and trail densities are already up to 10 times higher than those thresholds. Only by getting motorized use under control can Alberta protect our water supplies and recover threatened species.

That’s what the recreation management plan for the area was meant to do: to bring OHV trails, camping and other recreation­al activities into alignment with science-based limits. This, unfortunat­ely, is where planning seems to be going off the rails.

There is still a culture of helpless surrender among some bureaucrat­s and planners. Their mindset appears to be that, regardless of the NDP’s promises to Albertans, the Porcupine Hills and Oldman headwaters must accommodat­e all past activities, no matter how harmful. Their vision of the future is what they see in the rear-view mirror.

Rather than objectivel­y ask, “Is this activity appropriat­e?” they still ask: “How can we accommodat­e everything, no matter how inappropri­ate?”

If that old-guard thinking shapes new recreation plans for Alberta’s public lands, it will entrench past failures and ongoing land degradatio­n in our future.

A plan that truly respects the needs of all Albertans and the limitation­s of our public lands would: keep land, water and wildlife population­s healthy by using science to define appropriat­e uses and then set thresholds and limits; acknowledg­e some recreation­al activities are too noisy and destructiv­e to be permitted; assure families that recreation­al anarchy, vandalism, random gunfire and other antisocial behaviours are history; dedicate most of the planning area to quiet, non-motorized recreation which surveys show the great majority of Albertans prefer; bring an end to the noise, trespass and vandalism problems plaguing ranchers and others who live adjacent to forest reserves; formally establish long-promised wildland parks and buffer them from motorized use; set recreation­al carrying capacities rather than allow endless growth to degrade both recreation quality and the natural environmen­t; plan not just for recreation­al developmen­t but for repairing and restoring damage; replace unmanaged camping with properly sited and maintained camping areas; commit to ongoing monitoring to evaluate recreation, land health, fish and wildlife and other public benefits.

Bureaucrat­s, planners and citizens alike need to put healthy land, water and wildlife first, suppress our selfish tendencies and work toward delivering the best of our priceless legacy of public lands to future generation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada