Calgary Herald

CONTROVERS­IAL EVENTS IN THE HISTORY OF ENERGY EAST PIPELINE

-

TransCanad­a Corp. has cancelled its $15.7-billion proposed Energy East pipeline, with CEO Russ Girling citing non-specific “changed circumstan­ces” Thursday morning. Supporters of the Calgary-based company’s project — which would build and operate a 4,500-km pipeline from Alberta to the East Coast — are casting the blame on costs and delays from federal government regulatory meddling, while others point to simple market forces. Here’s a timeline of events in the controvers­ial pipeline’s history:

Aug. 1, 2013: TransCanad­a announces at the height of the oil boom that it is officially moving ahead with the Energy East pipeline project, promising jobs, tax revenue and energy security.

Oct. 29, 2014: A report released by environmen­tal groups questions whether Energy East is necessary to supplant Eastern Canada’s oil imports from the foreign suppliers frequently mentioned by TransCanad­a. The company has said repeatedly that Eastern Canadian refiners rely on imports for 86 per cent of their daily needs.

May 13, 2015: More than 60 organizati­ons call on the National Energy Board to suspend TransCanad­a’s applicatio­n for the Energy East pipeline. Groups including Greenpeace Canada, the Council of Canadians and the David Suzuki Foundation said in a letter to the federal pipeline regulator that it should suspend the review process while waiting for new informatio­n from the company.

July 31, 2015: TransCanad­a warns the $12-billion price tag for its Energy East pipeline project is expected to grow. The company says a decision in April to relocate a proposed marine terminal at Cacouna, Que., due in part to concern for beluga whales near the site, will increase costs.

Aug. 19, 2015: TransCanad­a says concerns raised about Energy East in a report about the potential impact of the project on whales and some fisheries in the Bay of Fundy are unfounded. A report released by the Conservati­on Council of New Brunswick said noise from tanker traffic causes heightened levels of stress for the North Atlantic right whale, the most endangered large whale in the world.

Oct. 8, 2015: Environmen­tal group Environmen­tal Defence says the National Energy Board is rushing the process for Energy East by gathering oral traditiona­l evidence from Aboriginal bands before it has received

a complete applicatio­n.

Dec. 17, 2015: TransCanad­a files an amended applicatio­n and cost estimate of $15.7 billion for Energy East.

Feb. 3, 2016: The National Energy Board directs TransCanad­a to rework its applicatio­n to build the contentiou­s Energy East pipeline because the document is too hard to understand — even for experts.

March 1, 2016: National cohesion on Energy East drifts further out of reach after the Quebec government announces plans to seek an injunction against TransCanad­a.

March 7, 2016: Protesters in Quebec disrupt hearings into the Energy East project seconds after they officially started. The province’s environmen­tal regulation agency quickly suspended hearings into the project, which were meant to conduct an environmen­tal assessment of the risks and benefits and produce a report to Quebec’s environmen­t minister.

June 16, 2016: The National Energy Board says it has officially started the clock on its review of Energy East. The NEB now has 21 months to hold hearings along the 4,500-km route from Alberta to New Brunswick and report to government whether the pipeline is in the national interest.

Aug. 30, 2016: All future National Energy Board hearings into TransCanad­a’s Energy East pipeline project are suspended until the board rules on motions demanding two of three panel members resign. The NEB board received the motions after a news report revealed the two members met with ex-Quebec premier Jean Charest, who was at the time a paid consultant for TransCanad­a.

Sept. 9, 2016: The National Energy Board sidelines all three Energy East reviewers following complaints that two of them met privately with a TransCanad­a consultant the year before and discussed the proposed oil pipeline.

Jan. 27, 2017: The new National Energy Board panel tasked with reviewing the Energy East pipeline decides to throw out all of the decisions made by the previous panel.

Aug. 23, 2017: The National Energy Board says it will allow wider discussion of greenhouse gas emission issues in upcoming hearings for the Energy East pipeline.

Oct. 5, 2017: TransCanad­a announces it is no longer going ahead with the Energy East pipeline project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada