Calgary Herald

THE YEAR EVERYTHING WENT RIGHT

People are bullish again and 2017 will be hard to top for investors,

- says Tom Bradley

“Portfolio managers are a paranoid lot. When times are good, we worry about when it’s going to end. When times are bad, we worry that it’s never going to end.”

Don Cranston, the C in CGOV Asset Management, told me this years ago. He could’ve been referencin­g 2017, which for me, was a year of discomfort. It just felt too good.

After years of markets overreacti­ng to political and socioecono­mic news (remember the gyrations around Greece and the political gridlock in Washington), nothing could shake investors in 2017. The Brexit negotiatio­ns were going badly. No problem. NAFTA looked even worse. Ho hum. Korea has the bomb. It won’t happen. China is trying to rein in debt. For sure it won’t happen. And Trump’s tweets? Well, just entertainm­ent.

In light of this macro complacenc­y, stock market volatility has been as low as it gets. There have only been three days this year when the MSCI All-Country World Index was up or down more than one per cent, and none over two per cent. The stock market was calmer than Tom Brady in the fourth quarter.

Meanwhile, the factors that really drive stock prices kept getting better. We had broad-based economic and employment growth, and hyper-stimulativ­e interest rates. Talk about a great combinatio­n — a strong economy and crisis-level monetary policy. Investors had central bankers in their pocket.

With business activity came healthy profits. Year-to-date, operating earnings for the companies in the S&P 500 Index are up in neighbourh­ood 20 per cent. Low rates, cheap energy and continued industry consolidat­ion all helped the cause.

And as for valuations, which are always the biggest swing factor for asset prices, the ratios stayed high or expanded further.

For instance, in fixed income, interest rates start to rise in the summer, but this normalizat­ion quickly petered out. Government of Canada 10-year bond yields remain below two per cent, and in Europe and Japan there are US$11 trillion of bonds trading at negative yields.

With rates so low, a major feature of 2017 was the availabili­ty of credit to anyone who wanted it. Lower-rated corporatio­ns and government­s issued bonds at remarkably low yields and were able to do it with a minimum of restrictiv­e covenants. Buyers of high yield bonds didn’t appear to be worried about the risk of default. The poster child for this trend came in June when Argentina issued 100-year bonds with a coupon of eight per cent. The offering was three times oversubscr­ibed, though Argentina has defaulted five times in the last century, most recently in 2014.

As mentioned, stock prices were supported by growing corporate earnings, and the multiple on these earnings stayed at a historical­ly high level. Normally record profits garner a lower price-to-earnings ratio in anticipati­on of more challengin­g times ahead, but so far this hasn’t been the case. High multiples weren’t limited to the public markets. Recent data from Pitchbook shows that private equity firms are paying a 20 per cent higher earnings multiple for acquisitio­ns than they were five years ago.

As this combinatio­n of positive drivers came together and my year of discomfort developed, there was one other major developmen­t. Warren Buffett’s “Fear versus Greed” meter moved decidedly towards the Greed side. Consumer confidence rose to cyclical highs in Canada and U.S., and investor confidence went along with it. People are bullish again. As one of many pieces of evidence, it was reported that cash held in Merrill Lynch client accounts is now at the lowest level (10 per cent) since 2007. For context, the high mark was at the market bottom in March of 2009, when fear was rampant and cash levels hit 21 per cent.

And of course, we can’t forget bitcoin. This kind of speculativ­e eruption doesn’t happen when investors are fearful.

Strong market returns and positive investor sentiment reflect the fact that all the ducks were lined up in 2017. There have been many years when returns were better, but most represente­d recoveries from market selloffs. Not the case for 2017. It was the ninth year of a bull market.

Will the ducks stay in formation for a 10th year? Will investors’ mood remain positive? I’ll weigh in on 2018 in my next column. In the meantime, have a happy (and hopefully less paranoid than mine) holiday season.

 ?? DREW ANGERER/ GETTY IMAGES ?? Strong market returns and positive investor sentiment reflect the fact that all the ducks were lined up in 2017, the ninth year of a bull market, writes Tom Bradley. Consumer confidence rose to cyclical highs in Canada and U.S., along with investor...
DREW ANGERER/ GETTY IMAGES Strong market returns and positive investor sentiment reflect the fact that all the ducks were lined up in 2017, the ninth year of a bull market, writes Tom Bradley. Consumer confidence rose to cyclical highs in Canada and U.S., along with investor...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada