Calgary Herald

SEC said to step up probe of Tesla’s public statements

- MATT ROBINSON, BEN BAIN AND DANA HULL

The Securities and Exchange Commission is intensifyi­ng its scrutiny of Tesla’s public statements in the wake of Elon Musk’s provocativ­e tweet Tuesday about taking the electric-car company private, according to two people familiar with the matter.

SEC enforcemen­t attorneys in the San Francisco office were gathering general informatio­n about Tesla’s public pronouncem­ents on manufactur­ing goals and sales targets, according to the people who asked not to be named because the review is private.

Now, attorneys from that office are also examining whether Musk’s tweet about having funding secured to buy out the company was meant to be factual, according to one of the people.

The SEC inquiry is preliminar­y and won’t necessaril­y lead to anything more formal.

Tesla, which hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing, didn’t immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

Judith Burns, an SEC spokeswoma­n, declined to comment.

Doubts have mounted about Musk’s ability to take the electricca­r

maker off the market, sending the stock tumbling nearly five per cent to close at US$352.45 in Thursday, well off the US$420 at which Musk said shareholde­rs would be bought out. The shares have dropped on back-to-back days after having jumped 11 per cent on Tuesday, when Musk vowed that he had “funding secured” at a spectacula­r US$82 billion valuation.

The scrutiny adds to pressure on Musk, who has a history of setting sales targets that bulls consider to be aggressive and bears contend are unrealisti­c. The question for regulators is whether any of his public statements or the company’s run afoul of federal securities laws. Generally, the SEC considers statements by executives to be material informatio­n that have to be true.

Speculatio­n has been swirling around Tesla and Musk’s disclosure­s amid the yearlong struggle the company had ramping up production of the Model 3 sedan, the first vehicle that the company has attempted to mass manufactur­e.

One analyst asked during an earnings call earlier this month whether Tesla had received a notice from a regulator that would prevent the company from raising capital. Musk, who’s insisted for

months that the company wouldn’t need to seek more funding this year, replied: “I’m not sure what you’re talking about, but there’s no such notice from a regulator.”

The SEC first ruled on the use of social media for disclosing material informatio­n after Netflix Inc. CEO Reed Hastings wrote in a July 2012 Facebook post that views on his company’s video-streaming service had “exceeded 1 billion hours for the first time.” The regulator later determined that Hastings wouldn’t face enforcemen­t action and declared most social media “perfectly suitable” for communicat­ing company informatio­n as long as investors are alerted and access isn’t restricted.

The SEC routinely makes inquiries about companies’ activities.

In cases where wrongdoing is suspected, an initial review might lead to a formal investigat­ion that could result in companies or individual­s being subjected to enforcemen­t action.

Musk’s initial post on a possible buyout probably wouldn’t be enough to put him in legal jeopardy unless it proved to be false or inaccurate, according to securities lawyers.

Tesla hasn’t disclosed any sources of financing for the deal and no one has stepped forward publicly to say they ’re backing the plan. On Wednesday, less than 24 hours after Musk’s initial tweets, company board members said they had been made aware of Musk’s plan last week.

 ?? DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? Model 3 sedans sit on display outside a Tesla showroom in Littleton, Colo., last month.
DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Model 3 sedans sit on display outside a Tesla showroom in Littleton, Colo., last month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada