Calgary Herald

Shark film The Meg flounders

Action sequences get more attention than deep questions

- TINA HASSANNIA

THE MEG

★★ out of 5

Cast: Jason Statham, Bingbing Li, Rainn Wilson

Director: Jon Turteltaub

Duration: 1h53m “He looks heroic and he walks fast, but he’s got a negative attitude” is how one character sums up the leading man in The Meg. While accurate — Jason Statham’s role as Jonas, a deepsea rescue rogue, plays up his signature obstinance when no one believes his claim to have seen a 70-foot shark — it is also the kind of worn-out, self-winking sentiment that undoes the thrill-rides here.

Statham’s cry-wolf moment is more than a twee sighting of the Loch Ness Monster. He sacrifices two men during a deepsea mission in order to save the rest of the crew, a decision that sinks his career.

But when the Meg — short for Megalodon, a ginormous prehistori­c creature resembling a shark-shaped turd — is seen once more, this time beneath a hidden layer of ocean, Jonas is recruited to save a new research team trapped in the depths.

The team includes two members from Jonas’s first ill-fated crew — the still-resentful Dr. Heller (Robert Taylor) and the more understand­ing Mac (Cliff Curtis).

Along with Suyin (Bingbing Li) and Zhang (Winston Chao), they have been living and working at MANA One Station, a research facility funded by billionair­e Morris (Rainn Wilson).

Though here he’s made into more of a caricature — clueless, young, neck-bearded — Morris is the classic John Hammond opportunis­t.

Like his counterpar­t from Jurassic Park, his ambition to capture the beast (for fame or fortune, it’s never made clear) runs up against the practical concerns of Jonas and the rest. Now that the Meg ’s existentia­l status has been proven, they know the only way to avoid havoc is to kill it.

Speaking of existentia­l, this is in part a typical man-versusnatu­re narrative: does adventurin­g in the name of science justify the inherent potential for human casualties? Will this team manage to survive the might of the Meg ? If they do, are they justified in killing the creature to spare human lives?

If the film is smart enough to at least ask some deeper questions, though, they serve mostly as philosophi­cal window-dressing for the action sequences.

Some of these are admittedly exciting. But there at least two too many, for instance a sequence at a Chinese beach that dots swimmers so perfectly along the shore that its CGI algorithm is near-perceptibl­e, like code from The Matrix.

The platitudes and corny music employed here also seem better suited to a 1990s film than a grand epic. As do lines like “It’s a great day to go fishing!” which Statham proclaims in his best gravelly action-hero voice as the crew initiates their hunt for the Meg.

And should we care that Statham’s built bod is blatantly served up to the female gaze (most notably Suyin’s) as he gets into and out of aquawear? Why bother pointing out his “negative attitude,” or any other attributes, if the film is only interested in him as a sex symbol?

For that matter, is it really worth self-conscious nods to the audience when genre convention­s are performed with at best perfunctor­y gusto and come up short in producing a half-decently scary action film?

Perhaps these are the wrong questions to ask of a shark movie. It’s not Jaws. But then again, nothing ever is.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada