Housing market ‘vulnerable’ even as overvaluation eases: CMHC
The country’s overall real estate market remains “vulnerable” despite an easing in overvaluation in cities like Toronto and Victoria in the third quarter, according to a report by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
The federal agency said Thursday that this is the 10th quarter in a row where it has given the national housing market a “vulnerable” assessment.
The findings in the quarterly report are based on a number of factors including the level of imbalances in the housing market related to overbuilding, overvaluation, overheating and price acceleration when compared with historical averages.
CMHC said it changed Toronto and Victoria’s overvaluation ratings from high to moderate when it measured it against factors such as population growth, personal disposable income and interest rates.
Meanwhile, the degree of overall vulnerability remains high in Hamilton, Ont., and also in Vancouver, where the housing market has cooled in recent quarters but property prices remain high compared to these economic fundamentals.
Still, the agency noted that the country’s overall vulnerability rating could be downgraded in future quarters due to signs that overheating and overbuilding remain low in some markets.
“In Toronto, we’ve seen an easing of the pressures of overvaluation because house price growth has moderated and so the level of prices isn’t increasing as quickly but fundamentals are still growing at a strong rate so there has been a narrowing of that gap between actual house prices and fundamentals,” CMHC chief economist Bob Dugan told reporters.
Dugan noted that the agency doesn’t “target” any level of overvaluation in its report.
“Overvaluation doesn’t really have anything to do with affordability,” he said. “In Toronto, you can have prices in line with fundamentals but that doesn’t meant that affordability isn’t a challenge. What it means is that there is a relationship between these fundamentals and prices that can explain the level of prices.”
Last month, the Canadian Real Estate Association reported that national home sales were down 19 per cent in December year over year, capping off the weakest annual sales ever reported since 2012.
The mortgage stress test, which is mandated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, came into effect in 2018 and has resulted in the cooling of some housing markets — particularly in Toronto and Vancouver — by limiting the ability of those with a more than 20-per-cent down payment to qualify for mortgages.
The stricter rules requires borrowers to prove that they can service their uninsured mortgage at a qualifying rate of the greater of the contractual mortgage rate plus two percentage points or the fiveyear benchmark rate published by the Bank of Canada. The policy also reduced the maximum amount buyers would be able to borrow to buy a home.
Earlier this week, the Toronto Real Estate Board urged the feds to “revisit” whether the stress test is still warranted, especially given the higher interest rate environment of today. Some bank economists have also recently called into question whether the rules around the test should be loosened.
Dugan said the impact of the stress test is clear, but it cannot be blamed to be the sole contributor to the slowing in some markets.
“What we’ve observed in housing markets is that we’ve seen a moderation in activity in many centres across Canada since the stress test has been imposed. But there are other things going on as well with respect to fundamentals which are contributing to some of the slower demand,” he said.
“We’ve seen mortgage rates inch up this year. There is a combination of factors. It is hard to isolate the impact of the stress test by itself but certainly it attributed to some of the slowing demand we have seen.”
Kevin Lee, chief executive with the Canadian Homebuilders’ Association, said adjusting the mortgage stress test was one of the group’s proposals to the federal government. Lee said he’s had a number of meetings recently with the Prime Minister’s Office and other government officials where he’s shared the association’s concerns about the lack of housing affordability.
“The economic times have changed but the stress test, the way it was put in place, wasn’t built to change no matter what the economic conditions ...,” he said. “We do think it’s time to revisit it.”
He said the group also suggested increasing the current amortization period of mortgages to 30 years, from the current 25 years, especially for first-time homebuyers.