Calgary Herald

U.S. RULING BLOCKS KEYSTONE

Top court rejects Trump’s push

- CHRIS VARCOE Chris Varcoe is a Calgary Herald columnist. cvarcoe@postmedia.com

For those who back oil and natural gas pipelines across North America — including the Alberta government — Monday was a day to remember, but for all the wrong reasons.

A surprising court decision left a major oil pipeline in the United States, the Dakota Access project, facing a legal ruling to shut down within a month over environmen­tal issues.

Just a day earlier, the backers of the proposed US$8 billion Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline in the U.S. tossed in the towel after years of delays.

But the real news for Alberta arrived late in the day when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it wouldn’t let constructi­on on the long-awaited Keystone XL project start south of the border, although work continues in Canada.

It’s a project that Alberta taxpayers have more than seven billion reasons to be keenly invested in the final outcome.

The Trump administra­tion unsuccessf­ully attempted to unwind an earlier court decision, which involves national environmen­tal permits used to approve pipelines crossing waterways — requiring proponents to instead obtain more time-consuming permits, according to Bloomberg News.

It means almost all Keystone XL constructi­on in the U.S. is delayed until 2021, instead of starting later this summer, Bloomberg reported.

Calgary-based TC Energy issued a statement late in the day, saying Monday’s ruling “continues to delay large portions of constructi­on on our Keystone XL project,” but noted the company remains committed to the project.

“In Canada, our work in 2020 remains unchanged,” it stated.

None of this should be a surprise.

Proponents of the Trans Mountain expansion, Enbridge’s Line 3 Replacemen­t Project and KXL have faced setbacks for years — every step forward is often followed by moving back a few squares.

And sometimes, as was the case for Energy East, the project might just be cancelled

“If you look back a decade, this pipeline tug of war has been going on,” said Kevin Birn, an analyst with energy consultanc­y IHS Markit.

“Overall, it does raise questions about the ability to build infrastruc­ture in a timely fashion in North America.”

This time, the delays are unfolding south of the border, where a U.S. court decision Monday ordered the Dakota Access pipeline, which moves oil out of the Bakken in North Dakota, to shut down within 30 days. The courts vacated permits for the pipeline to cross under Lake Oahe between North and South Dakota.

The line has been operating for three years; appeals are expected.

On Sunday, Duke Energy Corp. and Dominion Energy Inc. killed the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project, citing delays and “increasing cost uncertaint­y, which threaten the economic viability of the project.”

“It’s an indication that it’s hard to build a pipeline anywhere,” said Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada.

“I keep hearing in Canada, ‘Oh they can build them so easily in the United States.’ Well, clearly not.”

Before the Keystone ruling came down, Christine Tezak, managing director of research at Clearview Energy Partners in Washington, D.C., pointed out there are significan­t difference­s between developmen­ts such as Dakota Access, Enbridge’s Line 3 replacemen­t project or Keystone XL.

But each case shows how robust the opposition is to these projects.

“If federal agencies don’t dot their I’s and cross their T’s and do a good job on permitting, the opposition to those permits is becoming increasing­ly successful on judicial review,” she said in an interview on Monday.

“The opposition has gotten more sophistica­ted. They’re bringing better cases and they are winning and they have been successful across a variety of venues.”

For Alberta, the ruling on Keystone XL comes just a few days after Premier Jason Kenney formally announced constructi­on on the project has kicked off in the province.

In March, the UCP government made a $1.5 billion investment in the project to see constructi­on start this year. It also agreed to provide a $6 billion loan guarantee next year.

The province hopes the long-delayed project will be completed in 2023, but with presumptiv­e Democratic presidenti­al nominee Joe Biden vowing to kill Keystone XL if he wins in the November election, the future remains uncertain.

But Kavi Bal, press secretary for Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage, noted TC Energy has already completed the cross-border section of the Keystone XL pipeline.

“While we are disappoint­ed in this (latest court) decision, there remains significan­t momentum behind Keystone XL,” he said in a statement.

“We’re confident TC Energy will continue to overcome roadblocks and setbacks like they have in the past.”

These court rulings come just days after the Trans Mountain expansion project won a key legal victory and continues to be built.

The Supreme Court of Canada rejected an appeal last week by several First Nations in British Columbia that wanted to challenge the project’s 2019 federal approval.

Former federal Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi believes the Trans Mountain decision shows there is a way to get major energy infrastruc­ture built, although it won’t be an easy road.

The proponents must reduce the project’s impact on the environmen­t, demonstrat­e a commitment to decarboniz­ation, and have “honest, open dialogue with Indigenous communitie­s” and respond to their concerns, said the former Edmonton MP.

“You will never be able to satisfy a very small group of environmen­tal activists because they firmly believe the only way to tackle climate change is to block pipelines,” he said.

“You need to have the vast majority of Canadians on your side, or at least satisfied that you are taking your obligation­s to those three areas very seriously.”

It’s easy to be cynical that

Trans Mountain provides a broad recipe for success, given the project is 70 per cent over its initial budget and still not completed. And it needed Ottawa to buy the pipeline for $4.5 billion when the private sector proponents were set to walk away because of delays.

But the Trans Mountain expansion is progressin­g.

Today, Canada’s pipeline headaches mainly originate in the U.S. — the main customer for Alberta oil.

And those problems just became a little more complicate­d on Monday.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada